San Diego Union Tribune “Conflict seen in race for judge’s post”

San Diego Union Tribune Conflict seen in race for judge’s post  February 26, 2014,  by Sharon Noonan Kramer
“Regarding the Feb. 24 Union Tribune Watchdog article by Greg Moran, ‘Judge candidate feels heat to quit,’ the gist is that a local legal advocacy group was pressured by local judges to drop its endorsement — which it did, of one of its members, Carla Keehn, for Superior Court judge. It was implied that Ms. Keehn should drop from the race [or get off their board of directors]. This would leave sitting judge, Lisa Schall, unopposed.
Not in the article, DA Bonnie Dumanis is also a group member. It raised funds for her re-election. According to Schall’s website, Dumanis endorses Schall’s re-election, as does San Diego City Attorney Jan Goldsmith and ‘all 127 judges of the San Diego Superior Court.’
Would Dumanis prosecute her fundraisers and judges for election tampering on behalf of a judge she endorses? Citizens have a right to vote without elections being fixed.” 
Today’s Damn Questions go to San Diego District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis via an email sent to Assistant District Attorneys Sherry Thompson and James Koerber.  Ms. Thompson and Mr. Koerber, if you would be so kind to please forward to DA Dumanis. Thank you.
The Damn Questions:
1. In 2013, did Tom Homann LGBT Law Association (THLA) endorse Carla Keehn for any Superior Court seat  — OR — In 2014, did THLA rewrite Policy #2 while lying to conceal their prior multi-seat endorsement of Keehn? 
2. Is this ADDITIONAL RACKETEERING (see RICO docs by CCFC) by a Judicial Council member; a Gov. Brown judicial appointee; and an alleged “non-profit” civil rights group that is a fundraiser for Dumanis, so that people can’t vote corrupt judge Lisa Schall out of office?
photo: Bonnie Dumanis3. San Diego County District Attorney Dumanis, are you going to investigate/prosecute your fund-raisers and county judges for colluding to fix a County election on behalf of a corrupt judge who you have a history of protecting from prosecution?
Just answer the Damn Questions, Please!  Thank you!
Dumanis Listed Endorsers:
(not listed, Jose Susumo Azano Matsura & thousands of dollars from his associates.) 
Elected & Appointed Officials
San Diego County Sheriff Bill Gore
San Diego County Supervisor, Board Chair Greg Cox
San Diego County Supervisor, Vice-Chair Dianne Jacob
San Diego County Supervisor Bill Horn
San Diego County Supervisor Dave Roberts
San Diego County Supervisor Ron Roberts
U.S. Congressman Darrell Issa
Former U.S. Congresswoman Lynn Schenk
California Lt. Governor Gavin Newsom
State Senator Joel Anderson
State Senator Marty Block
State Senator Mark Leno
State Senator Mark Wyland
Former State Senator and Assemblymember Dede Alpert
Former State Senator Wadie P. Deddeh
Former State Senator and Assemblymember Christine Kehoe
Assembly Majority Leader and Assemblymember Toni Atkins
Assemblymember Marie Waldron
Former Assemblymember Charlene Zettel
Former Assemblymember Martin Garrick
Former Assemblymember and Chula Vista Councilmember Mary Salas
San Diego Tax Collector/Treasurer Dan McAllister
San Diego Assessor Ernie Dronenburg
Former San Diego Assessor Greg Smith
Carlsbad Mayor Matt Hall
Carlsbad City Councilmember Lorraine M. Wood
Coronado Mayor Casey Tanaka
Chula Vista Mayor Cheryl Cox
Escondido Mayor Sam Abed
Lemon Grove Mayor Mary Sessom
National City Mayor Ron Morrison
Poway Mayor Don Higginson
San Marcos Mayor James Desmond
Vista Mayor Judy Ritter
Escondido Deputy Mayor Olga Diaz
National City Councilmember Alejandra Sotelo-Solis
National City Councilmember Luis Natividad
National City Councilmember Mona Rios
Oceanside City Councilmember Gary Felien
Oceanside City Councilmember Esther Sanchez
San Diego City Attorney Jan Goldsmith
Former San Diego Mayor Jerry Sanders
San Diego Acting Mayor Todd Gloria
San Diego City Council President Pro-Tem Sherri Lightner
San Diego City Councilmember Kevin Faulconer
San Diego City Councilmember Mark Kersey
San Diego City Councilmember Lorie Zapf
San Diego City Councilmember Scott Sherman
San Diego City Councilmember David Alvarez
San Diego City Councilmember Marti Emerald
San Diego City Councilmember Myrtle Cole
Former San Diego City Councilmember Tony Young
Former San Diego City Councilmember Carl DeMaio
Former San Diego City Councilmember
and Former San Diego County Supervisor Leon Williams
Former San Diego City Councilmember Harry Mathis
Former San Diego City Councilmember Byron Wear
Chairman of Pala Band of Indians Robert H. Smith
Chairman of Viejas Band of Indians Anthony Pico
Former Chairman of Barona Band of Indians Rhonda Welch
Former San Diego County Superintendent of Schools Rudy Castruita
San Diego City Schools Trustee Kevin Beiser
Former San Diego City Schools Trustee Mitz Lee
The Honorable Judge Frank Brown, retired
The Honorable Judge James Miliken, retired
The Honorable Judge Sue Finlay, retired
The Honorable Judge Linda Quinn, retired
The Honorable Judge Peter E. Riddle, retired
Former San Diego County Chief Administrative Officer Walt Ekard
Retired San Diego County Undersheriff Jim Cook
Rear Admiral Ronne Froman, retired
Former Commissioner, California Board of Prison Terms and San Diego Police Department Lt. (Ret.), Tom Giaquinto
National Non-Partisan Latino Peace Officers Association
California Narcotics Officers Association
California Police Chiefs Association
California District Attorney Investigators Association
California Reserve Peace Officers Association
California Association of Code Enforcement Officers
San Diego Police Chiefs’ and Sheriff’s Association
San Diego Black Police Officers Association
San Diego County District Attorney Investigators Association
San Diego Community College Police Officers Association
Crime Victims United
Filipino American Lawyers of San Diego
Lincoln Club of San Diego
Tom Homann Law Association
San Diego Restaurant Association
Neighborhood Market Association
San Diego Downtown Partnership
San Diego Associated Builders and Contractors
San Diego Association of Realtors
California District Attorneys
Nancy O’Malley (Alameda County)
Todd Reibe (Amador County)
Michael Ramsey (Butte County)
Barbara Yook (Calaveras)
Michael A. Petersen (Contra Costa County)
Vern Piersen (El Dorado County)
Elizabeth Egan (Fresno County)
Gilbert Otero (Imperial County)
Art Mallett (Inyo County)
Lisa S. Green (Kern County)
Jackie Lacey (Los Angeles County)
Michael Keitz (Madera County)
Edward Berberian (Marin County)
Larry Morse (Merced County)
Tony Rackauckas (Orange County)
Jan Scully (Sacramento County)
Michael A. Ramos (San Bernadino County)
George Gascon (San Francisco County)
Stephen M.Wagstaffe (San Mateo County)
Joyce E Dudley (Santa Barbara County)
Jeff Rosen (Santa Clara County)
Bob Lee (Santa Cruz County)
Jill Ravitch (Sonoma County)
Birgit Fladager (Stanislaus County)
Gregg Cohen (Tehama County)
Tim Ward (Tulare County)
Greg Totten (Ventura County)
Jeff Reisig (Yolo County)
Patrick McGrath (Yuba County)
Community Leaders
Charles G. Abdelnour
Bob Abel
Bruce M. Abrams
Marjorie P. Acker
Marc Adelman
Michael R Adkins
Kambiz Darafshian Agahnia
Taherh Darafshian Agahnia
Maxwell Agha
Michelle Agha
Andrew S. Albert
Cheryl Alethia Phelps
Walter D. Alexander
Mr Jerrald A. Alford
Steve Allen
Pat Alvarez
Auri Aminpour
Mary Aminpour
King Aminpour
Doc Anthony Anderson, III
J.J. Anderson
Michel Anderson
Madlain P. Arabo
Mark Arabo
Carl A. Arnesen
Terry S. Arnett
Andrea Arreola
Frank V. Arrington
Lesley Ann Ash
Alfred D. Atallah
Richard Atkinson
Raad Attisha
Armando Avakian
Don Azul
Bill Baber
Marci Bair
Theresa Bagg
David Bagheri
Sherry Bahrambeygui
Tia Ballard
Murray Bankhead
Douglas E. Barnhart
Mary Barranger
George Barrante
Albert R. Barret
Beverly Barrett
Dr. Linda Barufaldi
Susan H. Baumann
Robert J. Baumer
Kenneth Baumgarten
William Beach
David Beeson
Martha E. Bekken
Craig Benedetto
Michael J. Benke
Pastor William A. Benson
Eve S. Benton
Jack M. Berkman
Paul L. Black
John M. Blakely
Gerald Blank
Sharon Blanchet
Robert L. Boles
Betty Evans Boone
Paul J. Borden
Catherine Blair
Phil Blair
Tim Blood
Adam Boswell
Lee Bowman
Andrew D. Brooks
Timothy F. Brouillette
Barbara F. Brown
Pastor Floyd Brown, Jr.
Reverand Phillip L. Brown, Sr.
Rev. Gerald Brown
Meredith L. Brown
Mike Brown
Tom Brown
Alan Brubaker
Spiridione Brunetto
Lynn Pechet Bruser
Michael Bruser
Cindy Burke
Barbara Bry
Joel R. Bryant
Mary D. Bush
Michelle Bush
Diane Butler
Santiago Calvillo
Rachel Cano
Elsa Carre
Joan T. Casale
David Casey
Lisa Casey
Richard H. Castle, Jr.
Morris Casuto
Patrick W. Caughey
Arthur Cavada
Manuel Cavada
Allen Cazares
Roy Cazares
Guy Edward Chambers
Sam L. Charry
Han E. Chika
Alfred Chris
John F. Cihak
Elisa Cisneros
Albert Clark
Randall L. Clark
Kathryn Clenney
Tim Cohelan
Henry Coker
Herman Collins
Pastor Don Conley
Judith M. Copeland
Arnold Cordova
Alberto Cortes
Joe Cotchet
George Course
Ruth M. Covell
Lawrence D. Crandall
Nicholas L. Crandall
Gordon D. Cruse
Lawrence M. Cushman
Stephen P. Cushman
Bonni Cutler
Zapaher Dajani
Joe Dallo
Michael Dallo
Mike Dallo
Dominick Dannibale
Patrick W. Daniels
Gina Darvas
Robert Davila
Beatrice Davis
Geoffrey F. Davis
James R. Davis
Jan Davis
Adam Day
Julio De Guzman
Loma De Santis
Perry M. Dealy
Robert R. DeKoven
David K. Demergian
Ralph Denney
Philip J. Diamond M.D.
Jerelyn B. Dilno
Derick Dorner
Karolyn Dorsee
Reverand Charles Dorsey
Jodi Doucette
David C. Doyle
Nancy B. Doyle
Dominic I. Dugo
Ann Dumanis
Deborah Duncan Anderson
Mitchell Dubick
Dean Dunphy
Brian J. Dunn
Diane R. Duvall
Bill Earley
E. Lina Echeverria
William A. Eddy
Gary Edwards
John M. Eger
Anne M. Eichman
Walt Ekard
Jeff Elias
Deirdre D. Elliott
Saide Emamjomeh
Thor Emblem
Jane E. Engelman
Martha Estrada
Reza Fadaei
Janet Fagan
Eric Fallon
Joe Farrage
Bill Farrar
Sharon Feingold
Aaron Feldman
Lou Ferrero
Ron Ferrero Pham
Richard Feuerstein
Franne M. Ficara
Jerry Fick
James L. Fitzpatrick
Armando Flores
Ken Fortier
Everett Franks
Elizabeth A. French
Kimberly A. Fritz
Barbara Gagen
Elaine Galinson
Claudia D. Garcia
Nancy Gardner
Carole Garrett
Nancy Nevin
David Noonan
Dr. Peter Norland
Reverand Chuck Norris
David Norris
Barry Nussbaum
Ty Odeh
Ann O’Dell
Colleen O’Harra
Joseph V. O’Leary
Dene Oliver
Arturo O’Malley
Leonard M. Okun, M.D.
Elizabeth Pacheco Ballard
Diana Palacios
Barbara Pearson
Carrie Pearson
Bryan Pendleton
Thomas D. Penfield
Robert W. Peterson
Regina Petty
Justine M. Phillips
Michael W. Phillips
Darold Pieper
James Pieri
Rita Pirkl
Theresa Player
Michael Polanco
Ramin Pourteymour
Beverly Powazek
Conrad T. Prebys
Nadia Provenzano
Jamie Quient
Jared M. Quient
Manuel Ramirez
Erica Ramsey
Alan Rappaport
Jane Rappaport
Robert A. Rauch
Sandra Redman
Glenn Revell
Sue Reynolds
Keith B. Rhodes
Cathryn Richman
Lawrence Richman
Brian Riley
Paula Robinson
Rich Robinson
Robert Robinson
Jesse Rodriguez
Lisa Rodriguez
Paul Rodriguez
Teri Rodriguez
Michael C. Rogers
Nancy Rohland
Eric Rollason
Patti Roscoe
Charles S. Roseman
Allison Rossett
Ted Rossin
Heather Rosing
Allan Royster
Carlos C. Ruan
Dr. Budd Rubin
Cheryl Ruffier
Frank P. Ruffino
Sandeeo Rugg
Robert E. Rump
Renee Rupp
Ed Ryan
Hal Ryan
Thomas J. Ryan
Amy Rypinslaw
Richard N. Sager
David P. Salisbury
Wendy Santos
Gail Saucedo
Sal Saucedo
Elizabeth Savage
Dr. Gregory Scoth
Marc Schaefer
Frederick Schenk
Shari Schenk
Fredrick Schnaubelt
Louis Schooler
Bernard Schulman
Bob Scurlock
Elizabeth Schulman
Enid F. Schwartz
Steven R. Schweitzer
John Seitman
Richard M. Segal
Harriet Seldin
Brian T. Seltzer
Ana Serrano
Mohammad Shaban
Sandor Shapery
Dan Shay
Phyllis Shess
Ronson Shamoun
Tanya Sierra
Ken Sigelman
Lewis Silverberg
Abby Silverman Weiss
Scott H. Silverman
Andrew Skale
Elizabeth A. Skane
Spencer Skeen
Sheldon Sloan
Arlette G. Smith
Beatrice L. Snider
Richard Speare
Skip Sperber
Kelly J. Spoon
Roberta J. Spoon
Michael J. Spradley
Eileen Sprague
Wendy L. St. John
John H. Standish
Kesia Steele
Robert G. Steiner
Audrey Stephan
Carla Stephan
Rayna Stephan
Summer Stephan
Cecil H. Steppe
Todd F. Stevens
Gail Stewart
Mike Still
John W. Stump, III
Thomas W. Sudberry Jr.
Christopher Suhar
Joyce Summer
Ted Sundwall
Bruce Tabb
Eddy Taengkaew
Dendy A. Talbert
James Taylor
Hilda Thatoa
Pastor L.J. Thomas
Terry Thomas
Cybele Thompson
Donna R. Thompson
John Thomson
Maxine Thompson Richardson
John Thornton
Sally Thornton
David W. Tiffany
Kevin A. Tilden
Patricia H. Tirey
Christopher Todd
David Tos
Ryan Trabuco
Ben F. Tunnell III
Debra L. Turner
Vickie E. Turner
Marisa Ugarte
Thomas Van
Linda Vanderveen
Athena Vanderstaay
Rosie Valenzuela
Luis Vargas
Nancy L. Vaughan
Alan R. Viterbi
Caryn R. Viterbi
Janet Voharitwatt
Ursula D. Wagstaff-Kuster
Steven Walker
Steven S. Wall
Bill Walton
Joseph Wambaugh
Christopher Ward
G. Pitt Warner
Ann Warren
William Weeks
Ann Welton
Brent M. Wilsey
Claudette G. Wilson
Rick Winet
Gabriel Wisdom
Gayle Wise
George Wise
John W. Witt
Donald J. Wood
Dwain Woodley
Andrew Woodmansee
Jackie Woolf
Maria L. Yates
Rebecca Yeisley
T.J. Zane
Julia Garwood
Thomas L. Gayton
Bill Geppert
G.M. German
Susan J. Gilardi
Wendy Gillespie
J.R. Givens
Matthew C. Gleason
Michael Gleason
Robert Gleason
Charles Goldbert
Jan I. Goldsmith
Elvia Gomez
Terence and Barbara Gooding
Pat Gramm
James J. Granby
Steve Grebing
David Greenberg
Erica S. Green
Bennet B. Greenwald
Joseph M. Gronotte
Kenneth G. Gross
Randy M. Grossman
Allen M. Gruber
Lois A. Gubitosi
Karen F. Gurneck
Vance A. Gustafson
Charles N. Guthrie
Ruben Gutierrez
Benjamin A. Haddad
Marc A. Halcon
Ronn Hall
Leo Hamel
Hazel Hamilton
Kathy Hansen
Samuel A. Hardage
Crystal Harris
Jeffrey Harris
Stanford Hartman
Scott Hasson
Susan Heath
Mark Heineman
Roy W. Heringer
Luz Herrera
Dayna Herroz
James A. Hill
Scott B. Himelstein
Sunshine Horton
Patrick Hosey
Anne Howard
Bertrand R. Hug
Jason W. Hughes
Shay Hughes
Steve Hutchinson
Dr. Thomas Ichim
Amir Iravani
Rivka Israel
Barry Jantz
Robert K. Jassoy
Susan Jester
Chaplain Gerald L. Johnson
Keith B. Jones
Rebecca Jones
Dr. Elizabeth T. Jordan Ph.D.
Rose Lee Josephson Ph.D.
Kathleen S. Juniper
Andrew B. Kaplan
Linda Katz
Mel Katz
Sheila L. Keesling
Arthur J. Kelleher M.D.
Benjamin Kelso
David R. Kempton
Dwight H. Kensil
Jan Kettle
Robert Kevane
Habib Khalafi
Tony S. Khalil
Isam C. Khoury
Mr Michael M. Khoury
Charles Wesley Kim, Jr.
Mike Kirkeby
Ted Kimball
Howard E. King Jr.
Michael L. Kirkeby
John D. Klinedinst
Gregory E. Knoll
Ikenna Kokayi
Randie Kolender Hock
Lois E. Kolender
Julie Korsmeyer
Frederick Kosmo
Neill Kovrig
Mark A. Krasner
Marilyn R. Kriebel
Jeffrey Krinsk
Marcy Krinsk
Sarah J. Kruer
Alice Kzirian
Sami Ladeke
William Ladd
Janis Lafreniere
Ross Lajeunesse
Stephen F. Lambert
Denise Lamborn
Alex L. Landon
Kimberly Lanes
Melissa Lange
Melissa E. Laugle
Dick Lareau
Rickey Laster
Mitch Lathrop
David J. Laurent
Richard Layon
Richard Ledford
Wendy Ledford
Dr. James Lemke
Michelle K. Leroux-Burton
Jennifer L. LeSar
Joseph A. Lestyk
Donald Levine
John Pemrick Lewis
Dan Link
Marcia Liss
Marcia Lo Vecchio
Eric T. Lodge
Robert Lofgren
Linda S. Loftin
Charles Longo
Jose R. Lopez
Thomas Lord
Michelle Ludo
Thomas D. Luneau
Wells Lyman
William D. Lynch
James Macleod
Ronna Magown
Robert Mahlowitz
Jerry Mailhot
Michael T. Malowney
Mark P. Mandell
Michael S. Manley
Anita J. Margolis
Jordan Marks
Nash Maroki
Joe Mariscal
Stephen Marsh
Marla Marshall
Antonia E. Martin
Kathleen Martin
Glen McAllister
Patrick Mcarron
Sandra L. McBrayer
Shannon McCool
Lilys McCoy
Paul McDonough
Tony D. Mcelroy
Jack McGrory
Michael J. McPhee
Julie S. Mebane
Sherman Mendoza
Doug Metz
Juan Meza
L.C. Miccio-Fonseca, Pd.D.
Kris Michelle
Steven L. Miller
Arthur W. Mills
Mary Mitchel
David Mitchell
John A. Mitchell
Randy Miz
Liane Monson
Peter Moore
Robert Morales
Art Moreno
Cynthia J. Morgan
Barbara Morton
Michael Morton
Ann Mound
Albert J. Mrozik Jr.
David Muhammad
Ahmad Muhammad
Rudy Murillo
Nicole Murray Ramirez
Dr. Gary Myers
Tim Nader
Frank Nageotte
Sage Naumann
Jesse Navarro
Ron Nehring
Denise Nelesen
Bob Nelson
Christopher B. Neils

In YOUR 2006 Opinion, did YOU state that Dr. Kelman admitted payment from the Manhattan Institute after being confronted with his Kilian testimony’? – OR- Are YOU conspiring to silence me because YOU framed me for defamation for writing “Upon viewing documents presented by the Hayne’s attorney of Kelman’s prior testimony from a case in Arizona, Dr. Kelman altered his under oath statements on the witness stand.”? Just Answer The Damn Question, Justice Judith McConnell!

BIG Disqual of McConnell“Damn Question!” answered on behalf of Presiding Justice Judith 
McConnell ("PJ"):  The direct evidence proves it is confirmed by PJ’s, 
Justices Cynthia (“Aaron”)’s and Alex (“McDonald”)’s 2006 anti-SLAPP Opinion 
that Respondent Kelman did “alter his under oath statements" after being 
confronted with the Kilian transcript, a case in Arizona. The justices framed 
Appellant for libel in the 2006 anti-SLAPP Opinion.   

In their September 2010 alleged case review Benke, Justice Richard 
(“Huffman”) and Joanne (“Irrion”) willfully and collusively concealed their 
peers framed a United States citizen, Appellant 

1.) PJ’s fraudulent and framing November 2006 anti-SLAPP Opinion acknowledges 
Kelman “altered his under oath statements” after being confronted with the 
transcript from a case in Arizona, Kilian. PJ then framed Appellant to falsely 
make it appear Appellant accused Kelman lied about being paid to make revisions
 in a medical association, ACOEM’s, Mold Position Statement: 

“This testimony supports a conclusion Kelman did not deny he had been paid by 
the Manhattan Institute to write a paper, but only denied being paid by the 
Manhattan Institute to make revisions in the paper issued by ACOEM. He admitted
 being paid by the Manhattan Institute to write a lay translation. The fact 
that Kelman did not clarify that he received payment from the Manhattan 
Institute until after being confronted with the Kilian deposition  [sic, bench 
trial] testimony could be viewed by a reasonable jury as resulting from the 
poor phrasing of the question rather from an attempt to deny payment. In sum, 
Kelman and GlobalTox presented sufficient evidence to satisfy a prima facie 
showing that the statement in the press release was false.” 

2.) Appellant’s March 2005 writing accurately states Kelman “altered his under 
oath statements” when confronted with a prior testimony from Arizona, Kilian. 
As evidenced above, this is confirmed to be a 100% accurate statement according
to PJ’s opinion. Appellant’s writing did not accuse Kelman of lying about being
paid to make revisions in the ACOEM Mold Position Statement as PJ maliciously 
made Appellant’s writing appear for the purpose of framing her for libel. 
Appellant’s writing accurately states the Manhattan Institute think-tank money 
to Kelman (and undisclosed party, Hardin) was to write the Mold Position 
Statement for the US Chamber of Commerce. It accurately states ACOEM’s paper 
was a different version of the “commissioned piece”.

“Upon viewing documents presented by the Hayne’s attorney of Kelman’s prior 
testimony from a case in Arizona, Dr. Kelman altered his under oath statements 
on the witness stand.  He admitted the Manhattan Institute, a national political
think-tank, paid GlobalTox $40,000 to write a position paper regarding the 
potential health risks of toxic mold exposure. Although much medical research 
finds otherwise, the controversial piece claims that it is not plausible the 
types of illnesses experienced by the Haynes family and reported by thousands 
from across the US, could be caused by "toxic mold" exposure in homes, schools 
or office buildings. 

In 2003, with the involvement of the US Chamber of Commerce and ex-developer, 
US Congressman Gary Miller (R-CA), the GlobalTox paper was disseminated to the 
real estate, mortgage and building industries’ associations. A version of the 
Manhattan Institute commissioned piece may also be found as a position statement
on the website of a United States medical policy-writing body, the American
College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.” [ACOEM]

3.)  The 2010 Appellate Opinion by Benke, Huffman, Irrion concealed PJ, Aaron 
and McDonald had framed Appellant for libel in the 2006 anti-SLAPP opinion over 
her March 2005 writing. The writing was regarding public health and the mass 
marketing of a false scientific concept to lend undue credibility to Kelman’s, 
Hardin’s and Veritox’s scientific fraud upon United States courts. The six 
justices willfully aided and abetted the continuing defrauding of the public: 

“In a prior opinion, a previous panel of this court affirmed an order denying 
Kramer’s motion to strike under the anti-SLAPP statute… In doing so, we largely
 resolved the issues Kramer now raises on appeal. In our prior opinion, we 
found sufficient evidence Kramer’s Internet post was false and defamatory as 
well as sufficient evidence the post was published with constitutional malice.” 

“Thus any disagreement we might entertain with respect to our prior disposition 
would be no more than that: a disagreement. Given that circumstance and the fact 
that only nomimal damages were awarded against Kramer, the value of promoting 
stability in decision making far outweighs the value of any reevaluation of the 
merits of our prior disposition.” 

"We recognize that with respect to malice "courts are required to independently 
examine the record to determine whether it provides clear and convincing proof 
thereof." (McCoy v. Hearst Corp. (1991) 227 Cal.App.3d 1657, 1664.) However, in 
Kelman v. Kramer I [anti-SLAPP Opinion] we expressly rejected Kramer's argument 
that such independent review entitled her to judgment."

As Appellant’s allegedly libelous phrase “altered his under oath statements”, 
the only five words for which she has ever been sued, is proven true by PJ’s own
opinion; it is also proven Appellant is not now nor has she ever been guilty of 
publishing or republishing defamation.  If one has not published defamation, 
there is also no malice established for writing the truth.  The evidence is 
undeniable. Six appellate justice framed Appellant over a writing impacting 
public health, aiding mass marketing of scientific fraud and impacting mold 
litigations nationwide.

They made Appellant’s writing appear to have made a false accusation that it 
did not make to make Appellant appear to be a malicious liar for exposing the 
defrauding of the public. Now they want it hidden of what they have done.

The continuing damage to Appellant and to the public is far from “nominal” by 
the officers’ of the court intrinsic and collusive fraud upon the court.  
Respondents’ scientific fraud that Appellant exposed and was framed to 
be a malicious liar for it by PJ, has been used against many US citizens
and workers who have been injured by biocontaminants in water damaged buildings.
The false science founded upon conflicted interests, continues to be used in 
claims handling practices, denial of needed medical treatments and wrongful 
delay/denial of financial responsibility for causation of illness, disability 
and death. 

In March of 2012, the court incarcerated Appellant for refusing to be coerced 
to sign a false confession of libel under penalty of perjury, “Retraction of 
Sharon Kramer”. It was crafted by Scheuer, and submitted to the court in 
February 2012.  It also contained the sentence, “I do not believe Dr. Kelman 
committed perjury”. The jailing was terrorizing bullying of Appellant in an 
attempt to give her a “prophylactic experience” to silence her that PJ, Benke 
and other judiciaries have acted as corrupt politicians, not impartial overseers
of law. Appellant was strip searched, caused emotional distress and made ill 
from the unlawful incarceration. Now virtually destitute from the years of 
costly harassment, she asked the court on April 27, 2012 to pay for her needed 
medical attention. No response was received.

In April of 2012, the Court ordered falsification of the Sheriff Department 
record to make it appear Appellant was lawfully jailed under CCP1218(a) for 
violating the January 2012 Civil Contempt Order - to cover up that she was 
really jailed for refusing silence of PJ, Benke, framing her for libel 
in the predicate case and Appellant’s refusal to sign a false confession under 
penalty of perjury. This falsification of the Sheriff Department record occurred
when the Court ordered the removal of the false criminal record under PC166 
and replacement of it with a false civil contempt record under CCP1218(a). The 
libelous falsification of Appellant’s Sheriff Department record is a criminal 
act in itself, to conceal unlawful and criminal acts involving PJ & Benke.

Read the "Motion To Disquality Justice Judith McConnell Self-Known To Be 
Maliciously Presiding Coram Non Judice" at our sister blog ContemptOfCourtFor.ME.

“Does the foundational document of this case, the judgment as submitted from a prior case, show Sharon Kramer prevailed over GlobalTox, Inc., in trial and was awarded costs by judgment — or — is this Court acting with no subject matter jurisdiction under C.C.P. 664 (and thus no judicial immunity) to harass and conceal collusive criminal misconduct by plaintiffs, fellow officers of the courts and court clerks? Just Answer The Damn Question!”

As submitted For Dec 7th Motion HearingSharon Noonan Kramer

2031 Arborwood Place

Escondido, CA92029



Bruce J. Kelman (and five owners of Veritox, Inc., Bryan Hardin, Coreen Robbins, Loni Swenson, Robert Schreibe & Robert Clark)                                              



Sharon Kramer, Whistleblower of scientific fraud by Veritox, Inc. and fraud on the court by officers of the court 

Case No. 37-2010-00061530-CU-DF-NC Appellate Case No. D062764


Hon. Robert Dahlquist Presiding

Department 29

Motion Hearing Date December 7, 2012

1:30 PM


                1. In lawful accordance with Constitutional rights to freely speak truth in America and  Code of Civil Procedure 1209(b)[1] this filing may be read online at the blog, “Just Answer the Damn Question!” (short link  )  It is under the blog title of “Does the foundational document of this case, the judgment as submitted from a prior case, show Sharon Kramer prevailed over GlobalTox, Inc., in trial and was awarded costs by judgment — or — is this Court acting with no subject matter jurisdiction under C.C.P. 664[2] (and thus no judicial immunity) to harass and conceal collusive criminal misconduct by plaintiffs, fellow officers of the courts and court clerks?  Just Answer The Damn Question!

              2.  As of November 15, 2012 this case is now an appellate Unruh Civil Rights[3] case for the plaintiffs’, officers of the courts’ and clerks’ criminal roles in aiding the continuance of financially motivated discrimination against the environmentally disabled, their ability to live/work in contaminated buildings and the officer of the courts,, direct hate crimes[4] against the disableds’ advocate, Sharon “Kramer”.  As such, it appears that all case filings must also now be served on the Solicitor General of the California Attorney General’s office. (Attached hereto as EXHIBIT 1, is Kramer’s Civil Case Information Statement “Attachment” Appellate Case No. D062764 Superior Court Case No. 37-2010-00061530-CU-DF-NC)

            3. The Attachment states on page 5, E. SERVICE REQUIREMENTS

Required to be served on the State Solicitor General at the Office of the 
Attorney General under Unruh, Civil Code 51.1  This case is the continuance of 
over seven years worth of fraud on the court and a hate crime by officers of 
the court, their clerks and the plaintiffs against an advocate for the 
environmentally disabled, Sharon Kramer. It is to conceal they have unlawfully 
aided and abetted a scientific fraud to remain in U.S. public health and 
California workman’s compensation policy by framing Sharon Kramer for libel 
with actual malice for exposing the financially motivated scientific fraud in 
policy that is adverse to the environmentally disabled; exposing how it came to
 be policy; and exposing who was involved in mass marketing the scientific fraud
 for the purpose of misleading U.S. courts to deny liability for causation of 
environmental illnesses. 

            4. In October of 2012, Judge Thomas P. Nugent was removed from his courtroom, Department 30; with no explanation given and no punishment rendered for incarcerating a United States citizen w/o subject matter jurisdiction, for refusing to commit perjury by signing a false confession to defraud the public (among other unlawful acts), and the case was reassigned to this Court.

           5. The direct evidence in the case file, now in this Court’s possession, shows the case was overseen by the prior court for nearly two years with no subject matter jurisdiction. This is because the foundational documents to this case, the judgment from a prior case, Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer Case No. GIN044539 and its remittitur Appellate Case No. D054496 are known to the court to fraudulent and void to be used for any purpose. (Attached hereto as EXHIBIT 2 collectively are i.) the December 20, 2010 Remittitur stating “Respondents” were parties on appeal; ii.) the September 2009 Certificate of Interested Persons only disclosing one “Respondent”, Bruce Kelman; iii.) page one of the September 2010 Appellate Opinion stating Kramer was a prevailing party awarded costs by judgment; iv.) the judgment as submitted as the foundational document to this case in November 2010 stating only Kelman as the prevailing party and no costs awarded by judgment to Kramer; v.) Justice Patricia Benke’s January 2011 refusal to recall and rescind the fraudulent remittitur and vacate the void judgment; vi.) an except of Kramer’s Appellate Brief showing the Appellate Justices knew they were committing fraud on the court by falsely stating Kramer was awarded costs by judgment and that they were concealing the undisclosed parties on appeal; and vii.) the December 31, 2008 Abstract of Judgment which shows the courts recorded that interest accruing costs were awarded to Kelman on September 24, 2008 – contradictory to the judgment as submitted as the sole foundation of this case, which states they were first awarded by judgment on December 18, 2008.    

               6. The direct evidence in the case file, now in this Court’s possession, shows that Judge Nugent incarcerated Kramer in March of 2012, caused her bodily harm and emotional distress then falsified the Sheriff Dept record to conceal what he had done – with no subject matter jurisdiction and thus with no judicial immunity. [5] [6] 

              7.  This court is now ruling with no subject matter jurisdiction if sanctions imposed for Kramer blogging of the criminal misconduct of the prior court and being ordered to publish a false confession of libel on the interent for a sentence she never even wrote, by the prior court who also had no subject matter jurisdiction and held an unlawful trial; is a lawful court order.[7]  It would appear to not get much dirtier than this matter before this court.

              8. The direct evidence in the case file, now in this Court’s possession, shows this incarceration was for Kramer’s refusal to sign a false confession on March 9, 2012 of being guilty of libel with actual malice within the first public writing, Kramer’s in March 2005, of how it became a fraud in public health policies that it was scientifically proven by Bruce “Kelman” PhD and undisclosed party Bryan “Hardin” PhD, that the “notion toxic mold is an insidious secret killer” was only being claimed by the environmentally disabled because of “media reports, trial lawyers, and junk science unsupported by actual scientific study”[8]; and for exposing the purpose of the mass marketing of scientific fraud was to mislead U.S. courts to deny liability for causation of illness.

               9. The direct evidence in the case file, now in this Court’s possession, shows that officers of the Appellate Court framed Kramer for libel in their 2006 anti-SLAPP Appellate Opinion, concealed it in their 2010 Appellate Opinion; and then the prior superior court in this case attempted to gag Kramer’s ability to write of the collusive misconduct by officers of the courts – jailed her, physically harmed her and libeled her when she refused silence. (Attached hereto as EXHIBIT 3[9] is Kramer’s June 5, 2012 “NOTICE TO COURT.  I AM NOT APPEARING BEFORE YOU AGAIN.  YOU ARE A LIAR AND A CRIMINAL AND I FEAR FOR MY LIFE BECAUSE OF IT.”

               10. On November 7, 2012, Kramer appeared before this Court at a LACK OF COURT JURISDICTION “HEARING” that had been scheduled to be heard before Judge Nugent.

               11. This Court attempted to not hold the HEARING, claiming the HEARING was not a proper court proceeding.  This Court is now indisputably aware of its lack of subject matter jurisdiction, yet has not dismissed the case of its own accord and appears to be attempting to continue to make rulings in the case with no subject matter jurisdiction knowing the foundational document to the case, the judgment from the prior case, is fraudulent and void to be used for any purpose including giving this court subject matter jurisdiction.[10]

               12. This Court is aware of the law that once jurisdiction has been challenged, it cannot be assumed.  It must be proven to exist.  It is the Court’s responsibility to prove it has jurisdiction – not the victim of the seven and a half years of collusive misconduct by officers of the court, plaintiffs and clerks to prove this Court does not have jurisdiction.


             1.  A Certificate of Interested Persons submitted to the Appellate Court in Case No. D054496, which discloses there were multiple “Respondents” as parties on appeal and as is stated in the December 20, 2010 Appellate Court Remittitur.

           2. A judgment document from Case No. GIN044539 that was submitted as the sole foundation to this case in November 2010 which states Sharon Kramer was a prevailing party in trial who was awarded costs by judgment in lawful accordance with Code of Civil Procedure 664.

          3. A Notice of Entry of Judgment dated September 24, 2008, from the trial court to prevailing Pro Per Kramer in lawful accordance with Code of Civil Procedure 664.5(b).

          4. Documentation explaining how costs were awarded to Kelman with interest accruing beginning September 24, 2008, on the court recorded Abstract of Judgment of December 31, 2008 and Recorded Lien of January 19, 2009; and inconsistent with the sole foundational document to this case which states costs were first awarded by judgment on December 18, 2008. (All documents are fraudulent because the void judgment was antedated twice. Once when the costs were filled in w/o dating or initialing sometime in mid October 2008 making it appear costs were awarded on September 24, 2008 (three weeks before Kelman’s costs were submitted by officer of the court, Keith Scheuer, and include client commingled costs of trial loser, GlobalTox); and again when “mgarland 12/18/08” was added to the document after the abstract was recorded on December 31, 2008 by clerk of the court Michael Garland.)

               “The law provides that once State and Federal jurisdiction has been challenged, it musts be proven.” Main v Thiboutot, 100 S. Ct. 2502(1980) “Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time,” and “Jurisdiction, once challenged, cannot be assumed and must be decided.” Basso V: Utah Power & Light Co. 395 F 2d 906, 910  “Thus, where a judicial tribunal has no jurisdiction of the subject matter on which it assumes to act, its proceedings are absolutely void in the fullest sense of the term.” Dillon v. Dillon 187 p27   No sanction can be imposed absent proof of jurisdiction [Stanard v. Olesen, 74 S. Ct. 768] Once challenged, jurisdiction cannot be ‘assumed’, it must be proved to exist. [Stuck v. Medical Examiners, 94 Ca2d 751.211 P2s 389]  “Acts in excess of judicial authority constitutes misconduct, particularly where a judge deliberately disregards the requirements of fairness and due process.Gonzalez v. Commission on Judicial Performance, (1983) 33 Cal.3d 359, 371,374

               I declare under the laws of the State of California under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and executed by me this 29th day of November, 2012.


Sharon Kramer, victim of over seven years of collusive misconduct of the California legal system for daring to speak the truth in America against the financial interests of U.S. Chamber of Commerce affiliates on behalf of the health, safety and welfare of the America public.

[1] C.C.P.1209(b) states, “A speech or publication reflecting upon or concerning a court or an officer thereof shall not be treated or punished as a contempt of the court unless made in the immediate presence of the court while in session and in such a manner as to actually interfere with its proceedings.”

[2] C.C.P. 664 states, “When trial by jury has been had, judgment must be entered 
by the clerk, in conformity to the verdict… In no case is a judgment effectual 
for any purpose until entered.
[3] Unruh, 51. (a) “This section shall be known, and may be cited, as the Unruh 
Civil Rights Act.(b) All persons within the jurisdiction of this state are free 
and equal, and no matter what their sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, 
national origin, disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital 
status, or sexual orientation are entitled to the full and equal accommodations,
 advantages, facilities,privileges, or services in all business establishments 
of every kind whatsoever.” (6)...includes a perception…that the person is 
associated with a person who has, or is perceived to have, any particular 
characteristic or characteristics within the listed categories. 51.1. “If a 
violation of Section 51, 51.5, 51.7, 51.9, or 52.1 is alleged or the application
 or construction of any of these sections is in issue in any proceeding in the 
Supreme Court of California, a state court of appeal, or the appellate division 
of a superior court, each party shall serve a copy of the party's brief or 
petition and brief, on the State Solicitor General at the Office of the Attorney
 General. No brief may be accepted for filing unless the proof of service shows 
service on the State Solicitor General.”
[4] Penal Code 422.55(a) “Hate crime” means a criminal act committed, in whole 
or in part, because of one or more of the following actual or perceived 
characteristics of the victim:(1) Disability.(7) Association with a person or 
group with one or more of these actual or perceived characteristics.(b) "Hate 
crime" includes, but is not limited to, a violation of Section 422.6. which 
states(a) No person, whether or not acting under color of law, shall by force or
 threat of force, willfully injure, intimidate, interfere with, oppress, or 
threaten any other person in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or 
privilege secured to him or her by the Constitution or laws of this state or by 
the Constitution or laws of the United States in whole or in part because of one
 or more of the actual or perceived characteristics of the victim listed in 
subdivision (a) of Section 422.55

[5] March 14, 2012 Court Transcript, Court sent Kramer to jail for refusing to commit perjury to defraud public with no jurisdiction.

[6] Evidence that Judge Nugent falsified Sheriff Dept record on April 5, 2012 to conceal Kramer was incarcerated for refusing to sign a false confession.

[7] December 7, 2012 Kramer’s Motion For Reconsideration submitted under duress.

[8] U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s 2003 A Scientific View of the Health Effects of Mold by Bruce Kelman & Bryan Hardin, co-owners of Veritox, Inc., states, “Thus the notion that toxic mold is an insidious secret killer as so many trial lawyers and media reports would claim is Junk Science unsupported by actual scientific study.” (Kelman & Hardin were paid by the Manhattan Institute think-tank to write the Chamber’s position statement. The writing cites false authorship of also being co-authored by Dr. Andrew Saxon of UCLA, according to Saxon’s statements made under oath and the only billable hours being Kelman and Hardin. Kelman has stated under oath it was specifically written to be shared with judges. It was the subject scientific fraud of Kramer’s March 2005 writing for which the courts framed her for libel for the words, “altered his under oath statements” in the 2006 appellate anti-SLAPP opinion. They also suppressed the evidence Kelman committed perjury to establish false light reason malice. They suppressed the evidence Hardin was an undisclosed party to the litigation on the appellate court filed Certificate of Interested Persons. They suppressed the evidence that the duo’s scientific fraud had been found to be a “huge leap” not able to be used to deny causation of illness, by a superior court in Sacramento, CA.  Officers of the courts have rolled down hill from there in collusive misconduct to continue to aid the fraud to be used in U.S. courts against the sick, injured and dying; and to conceal their criminal roles in aiding it by harassment of Kramer.)

[9] June 5, 2012 Notice to compromised court w/no subject matter jurisdiction of courts’ criminal acts, bodily harm, emotional distress & harassment of US citizen

[10] November 2, 2012 Transcript of this Court being made aware it lacks subject matter jurisdiction because of fraud on the court by officers of the court, plaintiffs and clerks.

November 29, 2012 faxes went sent to the EPA, FEMA, several U.S. Congressment and Senators, and President Obama showing how fraud on the court by officers of the court in this case is aiding to defraud the taxpayers over the mold issue while the victims of Hurricane Sandy are also the victims of corruption in the CA courts and politics over the mold issue in Washington DC.  “Congress, Please remove scientific fraud from policy that moldy buildings do not harm ~ and while you are at it remove corrupt officers of the California courts who aid this fraud to continue nationwide.”

Please watch the October 2012 ONE HOUR INTERVIEW of Sharon Kramer by Mr. Walter Davis of Citizens Demanding Justice on behalf of the documentary, Lawless America The Movie. 

Please visit our sister blog, http://ContemptOfCourtFor.ME to see greater detail of the corrupt CA courts’ harassment of a whistle blower of scientific fraud in US public health policy, written and mass marketing to the courts on behalf of the financial interests of the affiliates of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.