San Diego Union Tribune “Conflict seen in race for judge’s post”

San Diego Union Tribune Conflict seen in race for judge’s post  February 26, 2014,  by Sharon Noonan Kramer
 
“Regarding the Feb. 24 Union Tribune Watchdog article by Greg Moran, ‘Judge candidate feels heat to quit,’ the gist is that a local legal advocacy group was pressured by local judges to drop its endorsement — which it did, of one of its members, Carla Keehn, for Superior Court judge. It was implied that Ms. Keehn should drop from the race [or get off their board of directors]. This would leave sitting judge, Lisa Schall, unopposed.
 
Not in the article, DA Bonnie Dumanis is also a group member. It raised funds for her re-election. According to Schall’s website, Dumanis endorses Schall’s re-election, as does San Diego City Attorney Jan Goldsmith and ‘all 127 judges of the San Diego Superior Court.’
 
Would Dumanis prosecute her fundraisers and judges for election tampering on behalf of a judge she endorses? Citizens have a right to vote without elections being fixed.” 
 
Today’s Damn Questions go to San Diego District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis via an email sent to Assistant District Attorneys Sherry Thompson and James Koerber.  Ms. Thompson and Mr. Koerber, if you would be so kind to please forward to DA Dumanis. Thank you.
 
The Damn Questions:
 
1. In 2013, did Tom Homann LGBT Law Association (THLA) endorse Carla Keehn for any Superior Court seat  — OR — In 2014, did THLA rewrite Policy #2 while lying to conceal their prior multi-seat endorsement of Keehn? 
 
2. Is this ADDITIONAL RACKETEERING (see RICO docs by CCFC) by a Judicial Council member; a Gov. Brown judicial appointee; and an alleged “non-profit” civil rights group that is a fundraiser for Dumanis, so that people can’t vote corrupt judge Lisa Schall out of office?
 
 
photo: Bonnie Dumanis3. San Diego County District Attorney Dumanis, are you going to investigate/prosecute your fund-raisers and county judges for colluding to fix a County election on behalf of a corrupt judge who you have a history of protecting from prosecution?
Just answer the Damn Questions, Please!  Thank you!
 
 
Dumanis Listed Endorsers:
(not listed, Jose Susumo Azano Matsura & thousands of dollars from his associates.) 
 
Elected & Appointed Officials
San Diego County Sheriff Bill Gore
San Diego County Supervisor, Board Chair Greg Cox
San Diego County Supervisor, Vice-Chair Dianne Jacob
San Diego County Supervisor Bill Horn
San Diego County Supervisor Dave Roberts
San Diego County Supervisor Ron Roberts
U.S. Congressman Darrell Issa
Former U.S. Congresswoman Lynn Schenk
California Lt. Governor Gavin Newsom
State Senator Joel Anderson
State Senator Marty Block
State Senator Mark Leno
State Senator Mark Wyland
Former State Senator and Assemblymember Dede Alpert
Former State Senator Wadie P. Deddeh
Former State Senator and Assemblymember Christine Kehoe
Assembly Majority Leader and Assemblymember Toni Atkins
Assemblymember Marie Waldron
Former Assemblymember Charlene Zettel
Former Assemblymember Martin Garrick
Former Assemblymember and Chula Vista Councilmember Mary Salas
San Diego Tax Collector/Treasurer Dan McAllister
San Diego Assessor Ernie Dronenburg
Former San Diego Assessor Greg Smith
Carlsbad Mayor Matt Hall
Carlsbad City Councilmember Lorraine M. Wood
Coronado Mayor Casey Tanaka
Chula Vista Mayor Cheryl Cox
Escondido Mayor Sam Abed
Lemon Grove Mayor Mary Sessom
National City Mayor Ron Morrison
Poway Mayor Don Higginson
San Marcos Mayor James Desmond
Vista Mayor Judy Ritter
Escondido Deputy Mayor Olga Diaz
National City Councilmember Alejandra Sotelo-Solis
National City Councilmember Luis Natividad
National City Councilmember Mona Rios
Oceanside City Councilmember Gary Felien
Oceanside City Councilmember Esther Sanchez
San Diego City Attorney Jan Goldsmith
Former San Diego Mayor Jerry Sanders
San Diego Acting Mayor Todd Gloria
San Diego City Council President Pro-Tem Sherri Lightner
San Diego City Councilmember Kevin Faulconer
San Diego City Councilmember Mark Kersey
San Diego City Councilmember Lorie Zapf
San Diego City Councilmember Scott Sherman
San Diego City Councilmember David Alvarez
San Diego City Councilmember Marti Emerald
San Diego City Councilmember Myrtle Cole
Former San Diego City Councilmember Tony Young
Former San Diego City Councilmember Carl DeMaio
Former San Diego City Councilmember
and Former San Diego County Supervisor Leon Williams
Former San Diego City Councilmember Harry Mathis
Former San Diego City Councilmember Byron Wear
Chairman of Pala Band of Indians Robert H. Smith
Chairman of Viejas Band of Indians Anthony Pico
Former Chairman of Barona Band of Indians Rhonda Welch
Former San Diego County Superintendent of Schools Rudy Castruita
San Diego City Schools Trustee Kevin Beiser
Former San Diego City Schools Trustee Mitz Lee
The Honorable Judge Frank Brown, retired
The Honorable Judge James Miliken, retired
The Honorable Judge Sue Finlay, retired
The Honorable Judge Linda Quinn, retired
The Honorable Judge Peter E. Riddle, retired
Former San Diego County Chief Administrative Officer Walt Ekard
Retired San Diego County Undersheriff Jim Cook
Rear Admiral Ronne Froman, retired
Former Commissioner, California Board of Prison Terms and San Diego Police Department Lt. (Ret.), Tom Giaquinto
 
Organizations
National Non-Partisan Latino Peace Officers Association
California Narcotics Officers Association
California Police Chiefs Association
California District Attorney Investigators Association
California Reserve Peace Officers Association
California Association of Code Enforcement Officers
San Diego Police Chiefs’ and Sheriff’s Association
San Diego Black Police Officers Association
San Diego County District Attorney Investigators Association
San Diego Community College Police Officers Association
Crime Victims United
Filipino American Lawyers of San Diego
Lincoln Club of San Diego
Tom Homann Law Association
San Diego Restaurant Association
Neighborhood Market Association
San Diego Downtown Partnership
San Diego Associated Builders and Contractors
San Diego Association of Realtors
 
California District Attorneys
Nancy O’Malley (Alameda County)
Todd Reibe (Amador County)
Michael Ramsey (Butte County)
Barbara Yook (Calaveras)
Michael A. Petersen (Contra Costa County)
Vern Piersen (El Dorado County)
Elizabeth Egan (Fresno County)
Gilbert Otero (Imperial County)
Art Mallett (Inyo County)
Lisa S. Green (Kern County)
Jackie Lacey (Los Angeles County)
Michael Keitz (Madera County)
Edward Berberian (Marin County)
Larry Morse (Merced County)
Tony Rackauckas (Orange County)
Jan Scully (Sacramento County)
Michael A. Ramos (San Bernadino County)
George Gascon (San Francisco County)
Stephen M.Wagstaffe (San Mateo County)
Joyce E Dudley (Santa Barbara County)
Jeff Rosen (Santa Clara County)
Bob Lee (Santa Cruz County)
Jill Ravitch (Sonoma County)
Birgit Fladager (Stanislaus County)
Gregg Cohen (Tehama County)
Tim Ward (Tulare County)
Greg Totten (Ventura County)
Jeff Reisig (Yolo County)
Patrick McGrath (Yuba County)
Community Leaders
Charles G. Abdelnour
Bob Abel
Bruce M. Abrams
Marjorie P. Acker
Marc Adelman
Michael R Adkins
Kambiz Darafshian Agahnia
Taherh Darafshian Agahnia
Maxwell Agha
Michelle Agha
Andrew S. Albert
Cheryl Alethia Phelps
Walter D. Alexander
Mr Jerrald A. Alford
Steve Allen
Pat Alvarez
Auri Aminpour
Mary Aminpour
King Aminpour
Doc Anthony Anderson, III
J.J. Anderson
Michel Anderson
Madlain P. Arabo
Mark Arabo
Carl A. Arnesen
Terry S. Arnett
Andrea Arreola
Frank V. Arrington
Lesley Ann Ash
Alfred D. Atallah
Richard Atkinson
Raad Attisha
Armando Avakian
Don Azul
Bill Baber
Marci Bair
Theresa Bagg
David Bagheri
Sherry Bahrambeygui
Tia Ballard
Murray Bankhead
Douglas E. Barnhart
Mary Barranger
George Barrante
Albert R. Barret
Beverly Barrett
Dr. Linda Barufaldi
Susan H. Baumann
Robert J. Baumer
Kenneth Baumgarten
William Beach
David Beeson
Martha E. Bekken
Craig Benedetto
Michael J. Benke
Pastor William A. Benson
Eve S. Benton
Jack M. Berkman
Paul L. Black
John M. Blakely
Gerald Blank
Sharon Blanchet
Robert L. Boles
Betty Evans Boone
Paul J. Borden
Catherine Blair
Phil Blair
Tim Blood
Adam Boswell
Lee Bowman
Andrew D. Brooks
Timothy F. Brouillette
Barbara F. Brown
Pastor Floyd Brown, Jr.
Reverand Phillip L. Brown, Sr.
Rev. Gerald Brown
Meredith L. Brown
Mike Brown
Tom Brown
Alan Brubaker
Spiridione Brunetto
Lynn Pechet Bruser
Michael Bruser
Cindy Burke
Barbara Bry
Joel R. Bryant
Mary D. Bush
Michelle Bush
Diane Butler
Santiago Calvillo
Rachel Cano
Elsa Carre
Joan T. Casale
David Casey
Lisa Casey
Richard H. Castle, Jr.
Morris Casuto
Patrick W. Caughey
Arthur Cavada
Manuel Cavada
Allen Cazares
Roy Cazares
Guy Edward Chambers
Sam L. Charry
Han E. Chika
Alfred Chris
John F. Cihak
Elisa Cisneros
Albert Clark
Randall L. Clark
Kathryn Clenney
Tim Cohelan
Henry Coker
Herman Collins
Pastor Don Conley
Judith M. Copeland
Arnold Cordova
Alberto Cortes
Joe Cotchet
George Course
Ruth M. Covell
Lawrence D. Crandall
Nicholas L. Crandall
Gordon D. Cruse
Lawrence M. Cushman
Stephen P. Cushman
Bonni Cutler
Zapaher Dajani
Joe Dallo
Michael Dallo
Mike Dallo
Dominick Dannibale
Patrick W. Daniels
Gina Darvas
Robert Davila
Beatrice Davis
Geoffrey F. Davis
James R. Davis
Jan Davis
Adam Day
Julio De Guzman
Loma De Santis
Perry M. Dealy
Robert R. DeKoven
David K. Demergian
Ralph Denney
Philip J. Diamond M.D.
Jerelyn B. Dilno
Derick Dorner
Karolyn Dorsee
Reverand Charles Dorsey
Jodi Doucette
David C. Doyle
Nancy B. Doyle
Dominic I. Dugo
Ann Dumanis
Deborah Duncan Anderson
Mitchell Dubick
Dean Dunphy
Brian J. Dunn
Diane R. Duvall
Bill Earley
E. Lina Echeverria
William A. Eddy
Gary Edwards
John M. Eger
Anne M. Eichman
Walt Ekard
Jeff Elias
Deirdre D. Elliott
Saide Emamjomeh
Thor Emblem
Jane E. Engelman
Martha Estrada
Reza Fadaei
Janet Fagan
Eric Fallon
Joe Farrage
Bill Farrar
Sharon Feingold
Aaron Feldman
Lou Ferrero
Ron Ferrero Pham
Richard Feuerstein
Franne M. Ficara
Jerry Fick
James L. Fitzpatrick
Armando Flores
Ken Fortier
Everett Franks
Elizabeth A. French
Kimberly A. Fritz
Barbara Gagen
Elaine Galinson
Claudia D. Garcia
Nancy Gardner
Carole Garrett
Nancy Nevin
David Noonan
Dr. Peter Norland
Reverand Chuck Norris
David Norris
Barry Nussbaum
Ty Odeh
Ann O’Dell
Colleen O’Harra
Joseph V. O’Leary
Dene Oliver
Arturo O’Malley
Leonard M. Okun, M.D.
Elizabeth Pacheco Ballard
Diana Palacios
Barbara Pearson
Carrie Pearson
Bryan Pendleton
Thomas D. Penfield
Robert W. Peterson
Regina Petty
Justine M. Phillips
Michael W. Phillips
Darold Pieper
James Pieri
Rita Pirkl
Theresa Player
Michael Polanco
Ramin Pourteymour
Beverly Powazek
Conrad T. Prebys
Nadia Provenzano
Jamie Quient
Jared M. Quient
Manuel Ramirez
Erica Ramsey
Alan Rappaport
Jane Rappaport
Robert A. Rauch
Sandra Redman
Glenn Revell
Sue Reynolds
Keith B. Rhodes
Cathryn Richman
Lawrence Richman
Brian Riley
Paula Robinson
Rich Robinson
Robert Robinson
Jesse Rodriguez
Lisa Rodriguez
Paul Rodriguez
Teri Rodriguez
Michael C. Rogers
Nancy Rohland
Eric Rollason
Patti Roscoe
Charles S. Roseman
Allison Rossett
Ted Rossin
Heather Rosing
Allan Royster
Carlos C. Ruan
Dr. Budd Rubin
Cheryl Ruffier
Frank P. Ruffino
Sandeeo Rugg
Robert E. Rump
Renee Rupp
Ed Ryan
Hal Ryan
Thomas J. Ryan
Amy Rypinslaw
Richard N. Sager
David P. Salisbury
Wendy Santos
Gail Saucedo
Sal Saucedo
Elizabeth Savage
Dr. Gregory Scoth
Marc Schaefer
Frederick Schenk
Shari Schenk
Fredrick Schnaubelt
Louis Schooler
Bernard Schulman
Bob Scurlock
Elizabeth Schulman
Enid F. Schwartz
Steven R. Schweitzer
John Seitman
Richard M. Segal
Harriet Seldin
Brian T. Seltzer
Ana Serrano
Mohammad Shaban
Sandor Shapery
Dan Shay
Phyllis Shess
Ronson Shamoun
Tanya Sierra
Ken Sigelman
Lewis Silverberg
Abby Silverman Weiss
Scott H. Silverman
Andrew Skale
Elizabeth A. Skane
Spencer Skeen
Sheldon Sloan
Arlette G. Smith
Beatrice L. Snider
Richard Speare
Skip Sperber
Kelly J. Spoon
Roberta J. Spoon
Michael J. Spradley
Eileen Sprague
Wendy L. St. John
John H. Standish
Kesia Steele
Robert G. Steiner
Audrey Stephan
Carla Stephan
Rayna Stephan
Summer Stephan
Cecil H. Steppe
Todd F. Stevens
Gail Stewart
Mike Still
John W. Stump, III
Thomas W. Sudberry Jr.
Christopher Suhar
Joyce Summer
Ted Sundwall
Bruce Tabb
Eddy Taengkaew
Dendy A. Talbert
James Taylor
Hilda Thatoa
Pastor L.J. Thomas
Terry Thomas
Cybele Thompson
Donna R. Thompson
John Thomson
Maxine Thompson Richardson
John Thornton
Sally Thornton
David W. Tiffany
Kevin A. Tilden
Patricia H. Tirey
Christopher Todd
David Tos
Ryan Trabuco
Ben F. Tunnell III
Debra L. Turner
Vickie E. Turner
Marisa Ugarte
Thomas Van
Linda Vanderveen
Athena Vanderstaay
Rosie Valenzuela
Luis Vargas
Nancy L. Vaughan
Alan R. Viterbi
Caryn R. Viterbi
Janet Voharitwatt
Ursula D. Wagstaff-Kuster
Steven Walker
Steven S. Wall
Bill Walton
Joseph Wambaugh
Christopher Ward
G. Pitt Warner
Ann Warren
William Weeks
Ann Welton
Brent M. Wilsey
Claudette G. Wilson
Rick Winet
Gabriel Wisdom
Gayle Wise
George Wise
John W. Witt
Donald J. Wood
Dwain Woodley
Andrew Woodmansee
Jackie Woolf
Maria L. Yates
Rebecca Yeisley
T.J. Zane
Julia Garwood
Thomas L. Gayton
Bill Geppert
G.M. German
Susan J. Gilardi
Wendy Gillespie
J.R. Givens
Matthew C. Gleason
Michael Gleason
Robert Gleason
Charles Goldbert
Jan I. Goldsmith
Elvia Gomez
Terence and Barbara Gooding
Pat Gramm
James J. Granby
Steve Grebing
David Greenberg
Erica S. Green
Bennet B. Greenwald
Joseph M. Gronotte
Kenneth G. Gross
Randy M. Grossman
Allen M. Gruber
Lois A. Gubitosi
Karen F. Gurneck
Vance A. Gustafson
Charles N. Guthrie
Ruben Gutierrez
Benjamin A. Haddad
Marc A. Halcon
Ronn Hall
Leo Hamel
Hazel Hamilton
Kathy Hansen
Samuel A. Hardage
Crystal Harris
Jeffrey Harris
Stanford Hartman
Scott Hasson
Susan Heath
Mark Heineman
Roy W. Heringer
Luz Herrera
Dayna Herroz
James A. Hill
Scott B. Himelstein
Sunshine Horton
Patrick Hosey
Anne Howard
Bertrand R. Hug
Jason W. Hughes
Shay Hughes
Steve Hutchinson
Dr. Thomas Ichim
Amir Iravani
Rivka Israel
Barry Jantz
Robert K. Jassoy
Susan Jester
Chaplain Gerald L. Johnson
Keith B. Jones
Rebecca Jones
Dr. Elizabeth T. Jordan Ph.D.
Rose Lee Josephson Ph.D.
Kathleen S. Juniper
Andrew B. Kaplan
Linda Katz
Mel Katz
Sheila L. Keesling
Arthur J. Kelleher M.D.
Benjamin Kelso
David R. Kempton
Dwight H. Kensil
Jan Kettle
Robert Kevane
Habib Khalafi
Tony S. Khalil
Isam C. Khoury
Mr Michael M. Khoury
Charles Wesley Kim, Jr.
Mike Kirkeby
Ted Kimball
Howard E. King Jr.
Michael L. Kirkeby
John D. Klinedinst
Gregory E. Knoll
Ikenna Kokayi
Randie Kolender Hock
Lois E. Kolender
Julie Korsmeyer
Frederick Kosmo
Neill Kovrig
Mark A. Krasner
Marilyn R. Kriebel
Jeffrey Krinsk
Marcy Krinsk
Sarah J. Kruer
Alice Kzirian
Sami Ladeke
William Ladd
Janis Lafreniere
Ross Lajeunesse
Stephen F. Lambert
Denise Lamborn
Alex L. Landon
Kimberly Lanes
Melissa Lange
Melissa E. Laugle
Dick Lareau
Rickey Laster
Mitch Lathrop
David J. Laurent
Richard Layon
Richard Ledford
Wendy Ledford
Dr. James Lemke
Michelle K. Leroux-Burton
Jennifer L. LeSar
Joseph A. Lestyk
Donald Levine
John Pemrick Lewis
Dan Link
Marcia Liss
Marcia Lo Vecchio
Eric T. Lodge
Robert Lofgren
Linda S. Loftin
Charles Longo
Jose R. Lopez
Thomas Lord
Michelle Ludo
Thomas D. Luneau
Wells Lyman
William D. Lynch
James Macleod
Ronna Magown
Robert Mahlowitz
Jerry Mailhot
Michael T. Malowney
Mark P. Mandell
Michael S. Manley
Anita J. Margolis
Jordan Marks
Nash Maroki
Joe Mariscal
Stephen Marsh
Marla Marshall
Antonia E. Martin
Kathleen Martin
Glen McAllister
Patrick Mcarron
Sandra L. McBrayer
Shannon McCool
Lilys McCoy
Paul McDonough
Tony D. Mcelroy
Jack McGrory
Michael J. McPhee
Julie S. Mebane
Sherman Mendoza
Doug Metz
Juan Meza
L.C. Miccio-Fonseca, Pd.D.
Kris Michelle
Steven L. Miller
Arthur W. Mills
Mary Mitchel
David Mitchell
John A. Mitchell
Randy Miz
Liane Monson
Peter Moore
Robert Morales
Art Moreno
Cynthia J. Morgan
Barbara Morton
Michael Morton
Ann Mound
Albert J. Mrozik Jr.
David Muhammad
Ahmad Muhammad
Rudy Murillo
Nicole Murray Ramirez
Dr. Gary Myers
Tim Nader
Frank Nageotte
Sage Naumann
Jesse Navarro
Ron Nehring
Denise Nelesen
Bob Nelson
Christopher B. Neils

ODE TO TOXIC MOLD SUFFERERS by Sharon Noonan Kramer

This question goes to California Chair of the Judicial Council (JC) Cantil-Sayauke (who is also the Chief Justice of California) and to Judge Stephen Jahr who is the Director of the California Administative Offices of the Courts (AOC):

Honorable Chief Justice and Judge Jahr,

If Sharon Noonan Kramer is mistating fact about AOC employee falsified material court documents in Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation (SLAPP); being concealed as fraudulent by JC members, AOC supervisors, numerous officers of the court – including the plaintiff council, and the plaintiffs themselves; as court officers continued to use the fraudulents documents to harass her for exposing fraud over the mold issue — then why don’t you just provide the evidence that they are valid legal documents and prove her wrong? 

If you would also like to know the answer to that damn question –(which in reality means, “Chief Justice and Judge Jahr, can you disprove Mrs. Kramer’s allegation that extrinsic fraud in SLAPP by clerks and court officers with no subject matter jurisdiction, has been aiding federal contractors and their clients to fleece the public over TOXIC MOLD for now over eight years? And if not, why do you keep obfuscating from correcting the wrong, when YOU KNOW how many people are being devastated by the wrong?”) — then please tell the Chairwoman of the California Judicial Council (JC); the Director of the Administrative Offices of the Courts; and the President of the United States,  “TOXIC MOLD!  I want to know if the U.S. Public is Being Fleeced by Extrinsic Fraud” (link to 16 word MoveOn.Org Petition & White House email address)

The below “ODE TO TOXIC MOLD SUFFERERS” is part of a “NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE FEDERAL LAWSUIT” against the Chief Justice of California, and the Director of the Administrative Offices of the Courts (AOC) et. al., for conspiring with federal contractors of the U.S Department of Justice – the six owners of Veritox, Inc. – to defraud the United States public.  Please share the ODE and the Petition far and wide.  Only a LOUD VOICE of outrage will make this stop anytime soon. 

Federal lawsuits can be dragged out for years in such a David & Goliath situation. (This is particularly true when Goliath controls the courts but does not appear to give a damn for the law, anymore than Goliath likes to answer damn questions when Goliath can’t produce damn refuting evidence!)  Our courts of law are not playgrounds for the well connected. Yet, some have been allowed to abuse the courts in this manner causing innocent people to lose all they have, including their health and sometimes their lives. 

ODE TO TOXIC MOLD SUFFERERS

by Sharon Noonan Kramer  
 
To those harmed by the US Chamber Institute for Legal Reform’s (ILR) & the Manhattan Institute Center for Legal Policy’s (CLP) “A Scientific View of the Health Effects of Mold”; and by CA Judicial Council (JC) members’ concealment of court employee (AOC) falsified documents in Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation (SLAPP); and by the Silence of All Those Who Know  
 
If you’re poisoned by microbe toxins and no one will listen think of the largest lobbyist and coins which glisten. Know why elected officials will not give them a di$$in’, as the fleeced public continues to feel it.
 
A retired Assistant Surgeon General took a think-tank’s bribe. His written words and true science do not jibe. They’re spewed in U.S. courts as false denial diatribe, and U.S. Senate HELPed to conceal it.                          
 
A Citizen exposed how policy fraud came to be. She named those involved as she blogged of the fee. Cal courts framed her for libel so no one would see, and repeatedly refused to repeal it.
 
They jailed her and hurt her and falsified docs. She was terrorized for example so no one else balks. Excuses abound of why no one talks, CAUSING environmental injuries til a Loud Voice squeals it.
 
JC/AOC Heads seem political to the core. They shield court employee crimes hiding frauds of more. They may need to be shown the jailhouse door! and the Citizen knows how to reveal it:
 
 
Veritox’s extrapolations alone are not scientific proof. Expert witnessing that they are, causes cost-shifting by spoof. Falsifying court docs in Cal SLAPP puts culpability through the roof!! The admission of AOC’s frauds will seal it.
 
Uncontradicted evidence are considered as truths. Feigning they’re not are lies, court fraud and abuse. JC/AOC Heads’ refuting evidence would prove its not ruse. Since there is none, Mea Culpa to the defrauded must heal it!!! 
 
NOTICE Mailed on October 12, 2013 to 455 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 
To:
Tani Cantil-Sayauke, Chair, California Judicial Council (JC);  Steven Jahr, Director, Administrative Offices of the Courts (AOC); Mary Roberts, Chief Counsel, Legal Services JC & AOC; Ira Kaufman, Chair, AOC/JC Litigation Management Committee;  and sending to Ninety-Nine Persons including the six owners of Federal Contractor of Veritox, Inc., Bruce J. Kelman, Bryan D. Hardin, Coreen Robbins, Loni Swenson, Robert Schreibe, Robert Clark; along with their California SLAPP Attorney, Keith Scheuer, Esq.
 
RE: Kelman & Veritox v. Kramer, JC/AOC Legal Services letter 7/11/13, Kindly cease further obfuscation from addressing AOC employee felony document falsifications aiding federal contractors to defraud the U.S. public.
 
Hon. Chairperson Cantil-Sayauke, Director Jahr, Justice Kaufman & Counselor Roberts,         
 
You hold the key to stop those responsible for much causation of U.S. environmental disabilities from being able to shift their liability costs onto Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI). To turn that key, you must admit that AOC employees falsified material documents in SLAPP; and that AOC supervisors, JC members, court officers and plaintiffs concealed the falsifications as they continued to use the legally invalid documents in two SLAPP suits.        
 
As such, I was stunned when I received a form letter from JC/AOC Legal Services dated July 11, 2013.[1] It was in response to direct evidence that I sent on June 27, 2013[2] to the JC Chair and AOC Director. On June 12, 2013, a San Diego AOC employee mailed a document to me from a non-existent “The Court” [3] This, while abusing “The Court” to aid a judge to obfuscate from answering questions about misuse of prior AOC falsified documents, coram non judice.[4] A form reply to direct evidence of yet another AOC employee Penal Code 134 violation while defrauding the U.S. public is not an acceptable response from the overseers of California’s judicial branch.       
 
Deflecting your responsibilities to address AOC employee document falsifications onto complicit San Diego Superior Court supervisors, must surely be an oversight. And as you know, contrary to your directive to me, the Commission on Judicial Performance (CJP) does not discipline AOC employees and complicit AOC supervisors for AOC document falsifications. This key aspect of the sordid matter is the responsibility of AOC’s Director.            
 
If I have misstated fact that AOC employees have falsified material court documents, then why do you not just provide the direct evidence that they are valid? -or- In lieu of being able to prove me wrong; mitigate the damage for concealment of evidence and obstruction of justice while abetting scientific fraud to continue in U.S. policies to mislead U.S. courts? I.e. Federal contractor Veritox’s, scientifically void “proof” for the US Chamber that mold toxins cannot not kill or even harm people .[5][6] Their “Scientific View”, paid for by a think-tank, was the subject policy paper of my 2005 writing. .[7]Court officers framed me for libel to hide I exposed a massive U.S. defrauding.[8]             
                 
Kindly correct the record to reflect the truth and mitigate the ongoing damage. As the JC Chair and AOC Director, it is you who are ultimately responsible for AOC employee falsification of material court documents and concealment of them by JC members and AOC supervisors. The fact is, Chairperson Cantil-Sayauke, Director Jahr, Chief Counsel Roberts, and Justice Kaufmann, upon your personal acknowledgements of the AOC falsified documents in two SLAPP suits; the false concept that it has been scientifically proven by Veritox’s Mr. Bryan Hardin and Mr. Bruce Kelman that microbial toxins could never reach a level indoors to harm anyone, will cease to exist in public health policies, courts, medical schools, medical practices, and in workers’ comp, property/casualty insurer cost shifting schemes. U.S. physicians and policy setters will no longer be mislead to parrot fraudulently claimed proof of lack of causation of illness and death.     

 
Continued litigation usage and concealment of known material AOC employee falsified court documents are felonies. Penal Code 134 states, “Every person guilty of preparing any false or ante-dated book, paper, record, instrument in writing, or other matter or thing, with intent to produce it, or allow it to be produced for any fraudulent or deceitful purpose, as genuine or true, upon any trial, proceeding, or inquiry whatever, authorized by law, is guilty of felony.”
 
The key to stopping Veritox’s scientific fraud lays with you [Chief Justice Cantil-Sayauke,  AOC Director Jahr, AOC Chief Counsel Roberts,  and AOC/JC Litigation Mgmt Chair Kauffman] admitting to me and to the public, that AOC employee document falsifications have been concealed by AOC supervisors, court officers including Veritox’s attorney, and JC members, to aid Veritox with SLAPP over my writing exposing how their scientific fraud became policy – rather than U.S. environmentally injureds’ counsels needing to know how to discredit the scientific fraud, one mold case at a time, when it is used by expert defense witnesses as falsely claimed proof of lack of causation.”
 
[See court transcripts of Judge Thomas Nugent & Mr. Kelman discussing that they don’t want Kelman & Veritox v. Kramer brought up in mold cases; and WHY they don’t want it brought up – because its been carried out based on AOC employee falsified court documents by judges with no subject matter jurisdiction to try to silence me of scientific fraud and extrinsic fraud upon the court.]
  
“The point is this, Chief Justice Cantil-Sayauke, Judge Jahr, Justice Kaufman, and Counselor Roberts: You will be unable to prove that Judicial Council (JC) members, court officers and Administrative Offices of the Courts (AOC) supervisors did not commit felony concealment of AOC employee falsified material court documents in Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation; with the SLAPP suits being initiated by United States federal contractors and their California counsel against an advocate for truth in U.S. health marketing. Therefore under Penal Code 134, as JC/AOC governors, it is your legal responsibilities for you to not also commit felonies by concealment of subordinates’ concealments; and to mitigate the damage to the truth advocate and to the United States public for whom she advocates.

Direct evidence cannot be erased by stalling and obfuscations. I cannot be silent or silenced of the felonies. I cannot unknow what I know, and neither can you. Far too many lives remain at stake for one to be willfully blind.           

For the sake of public health, punish those involved for the frauds when you are unable to provide refuting evidence to my direct evidence that the following five documents are fraudulent and void. Please, no more delaying of addressing your responsibilities for the aiding to cause environmental injury of U.S. citizens and mass cost-shifting onto SSDI via concealment of document falsifications by those who work under your supervision of the California legal system.
 
1.          The December 2008 Void Judgment in Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer, Case No. GIN044539, void on its face, it states a date of cost award not possible to have occurred to conceal it was ante-dated, twice. California Chief Justice Cantil-Sayauke and Director of the Administrative Offices of the California Courts Judge Jahr, admitting that this one court document is fraudulent and void to be used for any purpose; will cause the fleecing of the public by Veritox, et.al, to immediately cease….…..
 
…….To reiterate the evidence that you already have, of how they concealed Mr. Hardin’s involvement and the implications of the US DOJ employing criminals’ services as expert defense witnesses.[1] Mr. Hardin was also a Deputy Director of CDC NIOSH prior to his retirement from the federal government in 2001. Like Mr. Kelman, he is not a physician and has ZERO research background of mold and its toxins. He is an undisclosed owner of Veritox in this eight years of malicious litigation. Veritox is reported by FedSpending.org to have over $1.3M in federal contracts, over $900K with the US DOJ for expert defense witnessing in toxic torts. ….
 
Officers of the 4th/1st framed me for libel in the 2006 anti-SLAPP opinion and suppressed the evidence that Mr. Kelman, who is Mr. Hardin’s co-owner of Veritox, committed criminal perjury to manufacture reasonfor personal malice in SLAPP (See fn 8, 10, 11 & 16 for direct evidence that you already know this). At this same time, Veritox principals, including Mr. Kelman, were serving as federal expert defense witnesses in mold litigation. Their client was the US DOJ and the plaintiffs were a sick military family living in moldy military housing.                 
 
Mr. Kelman was using his and Mr. Hardin’s bogus extrapolations to claim that the individual family members could not have been harmed by mold toxins, even though science holds that extrapolations cannot be used alone as proof of lack of causation of individual’s illnesses. He was being paid by the federal government for his “expert” opinion. He was simultaneously committing criminal perjury as a plaintiff in CA SLAPP over my writing of how his expert opinion for the US DOJ is based on his scientific fraud that was mass marketed into policy and to courts by federal contractors ACOEM; and by U.S. Chamber ILR lobbyists and the Manhattan Institute CLP….               
 
Additionally, Mr. Kelman provided the direct evidence in the SLAPP suit of Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer, Case No. GIN044539, that he and Mr. Hardin forged University of California physician co-authorship on the ILR/CLP “A Scientific View of the Health Effects of Mold”.  The proof came in the form of the CLP contract with Veritox[1]; billable hours for only Mr. Kelman and Mr. Hardin [2]; cancelled CLP checks for only the duos’ billable hours[3]; and Mr. Kelman’s direct statements in deposition testimony, July 2008, claiming Dr. Andrew Saxon of UCLA co-authored the scientific fraud for the CLP/ILR.[4] Yet in 2006, CLP/ILR listed co-author, Dr. Andrew Saxon of UCLA, stated under oath that he did not author the ILR/CLP’s unscientific “Scientific View”.                        
 
To quote Dr. Saxon three years after the U.S Chamber ILR’s “Scientific View” was published with him named as co-authoring it, “I’ve never seen that version. I’ll call it an unscientific piece that has my name on it.”[5]  Mr. Kelman also stated under oath in July of 2008, that he and Mr. Hardin were paid by the CLP (while forging physician co-authorship on the CLP/ILR policy paper) because the ILR/CLP wanted “something judges could understand”.[6]             
 
Had Dr. Saxon also contracted to co-author the CLP/ILR “Scientific View”, the Regents of the University of California would have received payment for their employee’s work.  All involved state that no one was paid for Dr. Saxon to co-author this paper — because he did not – or someone is lying about the contracts with the CLP and payments.  His name is forged on it to make it appear to have university affiliation and thus to give false credibility to Veritox’s scientific fraud written to mislead the courts.  This alone proves scientific fraud that they were trying to stop from coming to public light via these malicious SLAPP suits aided by your severely compromised AOC subordinates and JC member peers. 
 
Justices Huffman, Benke and Irion, had and suppressed this evidence when issuing the 2010 Appellate Opinion; and of how the “Scientific View” was being used to lend false credibility to Mr. Kelman’s expert opinion in a mold case in Arizona involving two deceased infants. Forging authorship and university affiliation on science papers to lend false credibility is also a legal matter of fraud. UC Legal Counsel on name usage, Mary MacDonald, Esq., along with the Regents and former UC President have had this information since 2010. [35]…..
 
As you know, under California law a judgment, void on its face, cannot be used for any purpose and Certificates of Interested Parties are to assure that appellate justices have no conflicts of interest in the cases they are reviewing. Glaring concealment of parties on appeal; the framing of me for libel with actual malice; suborning plaintiff and plaintiff counsel perjury on the malice prong of SLAPP; and the continued court officer usage of the AOC employee voided Judgment; with the US DOJ needing me discredited to protect their own toxic tort defenses; provides glaring direct evidence of appellate and lower court judiciaries having collusive conflicted interests, not in the public’s best interest — but in the federal government’s interest to avoid liability for causation of environmental injury of military families living in moldy military housing. (Moldy military housing. Many lawsuits. Veritox’s nonsense cited often)…………
 
At the time of U.S. Senate HELP’s 2007 deletion from federal audit of looking into conflicts of interest over the mold issue; I was not aware of the USDOJ using Veritox and their bogus science for defense in mold cases. I believed in my government and the courts enough to think that Justice McConnell’s November 2006 anti-SLAPP opinion must have just been a grave mistake — one that accidentally framed me for libel by deleting 14 key lines from the middle of a court transcript making it appear that I failed to investigate; concealed Mr. Kelman’s perjury and Mr. Scheuer’s suborning of it to manufacture reason for malice; concealed retired Asst. Surgeon General Hardin’s involvement; and stated false reason for suppressing the evidence of Veritox’s bogus science being thrown out of a 2006 Sacramento case — while her “mistakes” aided the scientific fraud of Veritox to continue.         
 
I’ve learned much in the recent years of just how deeply seeded the fraud really is. Sadly, I no longer believe in the integrity of those who govern this country I love, the U.S.A – another thing stolen from me by the compromised in the California courts and complicit politicians. In relevant parts, my July 11, 2013 cover letter to U.S. Senators of HELP, Senator Feinstein, Senator Boxer, et.al. states,
 
“In October of 2006, the late Senator Edward Kennedy was the Democrat chairman of Senate HELP. He ordered a Federal Government Accountability Office (GAO) audit of the mold issue at my urging.[1] This is because I and others had sounded the alarm to Senate HELP of the mass marketing of scientific fraud in policy and courts claiming false scientific proof that these environmental illnesses were not occurring, and the harm it was doing to the public.[2]  As I am sure you can imagine, it was no small feat for a Plain Jane average citizen to walk into DC armed only with proof of scientific fraud marketed into policy, be able to moderate a Senate Staff Briefing with a panel of true scientists on the subject, and walk out of DC with a federal GAO audit. 
 
Unfortunately, in February of 2007 [less than three months after Justice McConnell framed me for libel in her November 2006 anti-SLAPP Opinion] the following was deleted from the scope of the GAO audit by Senate HELP which gutted the possibility of anyone being punished for their role in the mass marketed scientific fraud or it being shut down completely from policy and courts any time soon. 
 
What medical and scientific standards are used in determining the admissibility of evidence of both acute and persistent health consequences resulting from exposure to mold?  Which individuals and organizations have promulgated these standards and what, if any, conflicts of interest exist regarding these standards?”
 
This deletion also left me vulnerable for horrific, relentless, politically motivated retaliation for exposing the mass fraud and its usage in U.S policy and courts.  For my efforts to shed light upon and try to stop what must be one of the dirtiest tricks ever played on the American public, I have been framed for libel in California for the 100% accurate words, “altered his under oath statements” in the first public writing, mine in 2005, of how the scientific fraud became policy; driven to the brink of poverty; jailed for refusing to sign a false confession of being guilty of libel; caused bodily harm; terrorized with threat of more jailing and more bodily harm; character assassinated; given a false FBI record; and court ordered to commit criminal perjury on the Internet by publishing a false confession of libel for a sentence I never even wrote — by a judge whose court had no subject matter jurisdiction. I was also court ordered to choose between signing a paper which contains the sentence “I do not believe Dr. Kelman committed perjury” or go to jail. I went to jail rather than betray my fellow Americans….I currently have tens of thousands of dollars of fraudulent and interest accruing liens on my property by those who “promulgated these standards” but were spared investigation in a federal GAO audit, USDOJ contractors Mr. Kelman, Mr. Hardin and their four co-principals of Veritox, Inc. The California courts have provably falsified documents to continue to harass me….
 
One month before the deletion from federal audit, Mr. Kelman, Mr. Hardin and ACOEM [also federal contractors] were the subject of a front page, above the fold Wall Street Journal article titled, “Court of Opinion. Amid Suits Over Mold Experts Wear Two Hats, Authors of Science Papers Also Work For the Defense in Mold Litigation.”[1]
 
No one denies the above is true or provides refuting evidence.  They just proceed on like Emperors and Empresses with New Black Robes – while the science fraud of Veritox plays on to harm many.”             
 
…..And if not able to provide refuting evidence, surely not less than one of you [the 99 persons sent this letter] could cause the Chief Justice of California, Tani Cantil-Sayauke; and Director of the Administrative Offices of the Courts, Judge Jahr, to stop the continuing damage to the U.S. public and to me, via their admission of concealment of AOC employee falsified court documents in SLAPP.  In reality, the JC/AOC heads and their counsel, only have to admit the falsification of one legal document to stop Veritox’s massive fleecing of the public. The 2008 Void Judgment from Bruce J. Kelman and GlobalTox, Inc. v. Sharon Kramer Case No. GIN044539, North San Diego Superior Court, Department 31, the Hon. Lisa Schall presiding. …               
 
Should no one in government from California to Washington DC choose to act to shut down this fraud while U.S. citizens are losing everything, some are being disabled and some are dying; this letter is to serve as notice of intent to sue the Chair of the Judicial Council Tani Cantil-Sayauke; the Administrative Director of the Courts Stephen Jahr; Judicial Council/Administrative Offices Chief Legal Counsel Mary Roberts; and Chair of the Judicial Council and Administrative Offices of the Courts Committee on Litigation Management, Ira Kaufmann; et.al. I will be filing suit for obstruction of justice, concealment of evidence and conspiring to defraud.          
 
NO ONE is above the law. SOMEONE needs to explain to the United States public and to my husband and me, why I was able to be so horrifically targeted for telling the truth of a massive fraud in America; with the matter sinking to new unconstitutional lows of felony concealment of legal document falsifications by judicial branch employees and federal contractors; along with why I was able to be falsely imprisoned in the USA, coram non judice, for refusing to be coerced into perjury –  long after I first exposed the fraudulent health marketing scheme and its proliferation of the deadly scientific fraud, to U.S. Senators. Shame on everyone in the know, if you still remain mum and force me, a lone U.S. citizen, into a David & Goliath federal lawsuit; while the public is greatly harmed by your silence…        
 
Good men and women who make mistakes of this magnitude, no longer make the mistakes or they are no longer good men and women. If you are good men and women, kindly let me know as soon as possible how you intend to proceed to rectify the damage and to bring this matter to timely, lawful resolution for the health and safety of the United States public; and for the promotion of future integrity in the California judicial branch and its Administrative Offices of the Courts. The fleeced taxpayer; the environmentally disabled; and my devastated husband and I would sincerely appreciate your prompt, earnest attention to this gravely serious matter.     
 
          This letter serves as just the tip of the iceberg of what I can prove of collusion to defraud the Unites States public by falsely claimed proof of lack of biotoxin poisonings occurring, via the use of scientific fraud in policy and courts.         I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws that govern the State of California and the United States that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. This NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE FEDERAL LAWSUIT, if government employees do not move to protect U.S. citizens from scientific fraud in U.S. policies and courts abetted by the compromised in the California legal system, is executed by me on October 12, 2013 in Escondido, California.                                             
Mrs. Sharon Noonan Kramer
  
Read the  NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE FEDERAL LAWSUIT in its entirety with working links to corroborate statements made.  Pdf may take a few seconds to open.
 
Please sign the sixteen word Petition “TOXIC MOLD!  I want to know if the U.S. Public is Being Fleeced by Extrinsic Fraud” (link to 16 word MoveOn.Org Petition & White House email address)
 

In YOUR 2006 Opinion, did YOU state that Dr. Kelman admitted payment from the Manhattan Institute after being confronted with his Kilian testimony’? – OR- Are YOU conspiring to silence me because YOU framed me for defamation for writing “Upon viewing documents presented by the Hayne’s attorney of Kelman’s prior testimony from a case in Arizona, Dr. Kelman altered his under oath statements on the witness stand.”? Just Answer The Damn Question, Justice Judith McConnell!

BIG Disqual of McConnell“Damn Question!” answered on behalf of Presiding Justice Judith 
McConnell ("PJ"):  The direct evidence proves it is confirmed by PJ’s, 
Justices Cynthia (“Aaron”)’s and Alex (“McDonald”)’s 2006 anti-SLAPP Opinion 
that Respondent Kelman did “alter his under oath statements" after being 
confronted with the Kilian transcript, a case in Arizona. The justices framed 
Appellant for libel in the 2006 anti-SLAPP Opinion.   

In their September 2010 alleged case review Benke, Justice Richard 
(“Huffman”) and Joanne (“Irrion”) willfully and collusively concealed their 
peers framed a United States citizen, Appellant 

1.) PJ’s fraudulent and framing November 2006 anti-SLAPP Opinion acknowledges 
Kelman “altered his under oath statements” after being confronted with the 
transcript from a case in Arizona, Kilian. PJ then framed Appellant to falsely 
make it appear Appellant accused Kelman lied about being paid to make revisions
 in a medical association, ACOEM’s, Mold Position Statement: 

“This testimony supports a conclusion Kelman did not deny he had been paid by 
the Manhattan Institute to write a paper, but only denied being paid by the 
Manhattan Institute to make revisions in the paper issued by ACOEM. He admitted
 being paid by the Manhattan Institute to write a lay translation. The fact 
that Kelman did not clarify that he received payment from the Manhattan 
Institute until after being confronted with the Kilian deposition  [sic, bench 
trial] testimony could be viewed by a reasonable jury as resulting from the 
poor phrasing of the question rather from an attempt to deny payment. In sum, 
Kelman and GlobalTox presented sufficient evidence to satisfy a prima facie 
showing that the statement in the press release was false.” 

2.) Appellant’s March 2005 writing accurately states Kelman “altered his under 
oath statements” when confronted with a prior testimony from Arizona, Kilian. 
As evidenced above, this is confirmed to be a 100% accurate statement according
to PJ’s opinion. Appellant’s writing did not accuse Kelman of lying about being
paid to make revisions in the ACOEM Mold Position Statement as PJ maliciously 
made Appellant’s writing appear for the purpose of framing her for libel. 
Appellant’s writing accurately states the Manhattan Institute think-tank money 
to Kelman (and undisclosed party, Hardin) was to write the Mold Position 
Statement for the US Chamber of Commerce. It accurately states ACOEM’s paper 
was a different version of the “commissioned piece”.

“Upon viewing documents presented by the Hayne’s attorney of Kelman’s prior 
testimony from a case in Arizona, Dr. Kelman altered his under oath statements 
on the witness stand.  He admitted the Manhattan Institute, a national political
think-tank, paid GlobalTox $40,000 to write a position paper regarding the 
potential health risks of toxic mold exposure. Although much medical research 
finds otherwise, the controversial piece claims that it is not plausible the 
types of illnesses experienced by the Haynes family and reported by thousands 
from across the US, could be caused by "toxic mold" exposure in homes, schools 
or office buildings. 

In 2003, with the involvement of the US Chamber of Commerce and ex-developer, 
US Congressman Gary Miller (R-CA), the GlobalTox paper was disseminated to the 
real estate, mortgage and building industries’ associations. A version of the 
Manhattan Institute commissioned piece may also be found as a position statement
on the website of a United States medical policy-writing body, the American
College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.” [ACOEM]

3.)  The 2010 Appellate Opinion by Benke, Huffman, Irrion concealed PJ, Aaron 
and McDonald had framed Appellant for libel in the 2006 anti-SLAPP opinion over 
her March 2005 writing. The writing was regarding public health and the mass 
marketing of a false scientific concept to lend undue credibility to Kelman’s, 
Hardin’s and Veritox’s scientific fraud upon United States courts. The six 
justices willfully aided and abetted the continuing defrauding of the public: 

“In a prior opinion, a previous panel of this court affirmed an order denying 
Kramer’s motion to strike under the anti-SLAPP statute… In doing so, we largely
 resolved the issues Kramer now raises on appeal. In our prior opinion, we 
found sufficient evidence Kramer’s Internet post was false and defamatory as 
well as sufficient evidence the post was published with constitutional malice.” 

“Thus any disagreement we might entertain with respect to our prior disposition 
would be no more than that: a disagreement. Given that circumstance and the fact 
that only nomimal damages were awarded against Kramer, the value of promoting 
stability in decision making far outweighs the value of any reevaluation of the 
merits of our prior disposition.” 

"We recognize that with respect to malice "courts are required to independently 
examine the record to determine whether it provides clear and convincing proof 
thereof." (McCoy v. Hearst Corp. (1991) 227 Cal.App.3d 1657, 1664.) However, in 
Kelman v. Kramer I [anti-SLAPP Opinion] we expressly rejected Kramer's argument 
that such independent review entitled her to judgment."

As Appellant’s allegedly libelous phrase “altered his under oath statements”, 
the only five words for which she has ever been sued, is proven true by PJ’s own
opinion; it is also proven Appellant is not now nor has she ever been guilty of 
publishing or republishing defamation.  If one has not published defamation, 
there is also no malice established for writing the truth.  The evidence is 
undeniable. Six appellate justice framed Appellant over a writing impacting 
public health, aiding mass marketing of scientific fraud and impacting mold 
litigations nationwide.

They made Appellant’s writing appear to have made a false accusation that it 
did not make to make Appellant appear to be a malicious liar for exposing the 
defrauding of the public. Now they want it hidden of what they have done.

The continuing damage to Appellant and to the public is far from “nominal” by 
the officers’ of the court intrinsic and collusive fraud upon the court.  
Respondents’ scientific fraud that Appellant exposed and was framed to 
be a malicious liar for it by PJ et.al., has been used against many US citizens
and workers who have been injured by biocontaminants in water damaged buildings.
The false science founded upon conflicted interests, continues to be used in 
claims handling practices, denial of needed medical treatments and wrongful 
delay/denial of financial responsibility for causation of illness, disability 
and death. 

In March of 2012, the court incarcerated Appellant for refusing to be coerced 
to sign a false confession of libel under penalty of perjury, “Retraction of 
Sharon Kramer”. It was crafted by Scheuer, and submitted to the court in 
February 2012.  It also contained the sentence, “I do not believe Dr. Kelman 
committed perjury”. The jailing was terrorizing bullying of Appellant in an 
attempt to give her a “prophylactic experience” to silence her that PJ, Benke 
and other judiciaries have acted as corrupt politicians, not impartial overseers
of law. Appellant was strip searched, caused emotional distress and made ill 
from the unlawful incarceration. Now virtually destitute from the years of 
costly harassment, she asked the court on April 27, 2012 to pay for her needed 
medical attention. No response was received.

In April of 2012, the Court ordered falsification of the Sheriff Department 
record to make it appear Appellant was lawfully jailed under CCP1218(a) for 
violating the January 2012 Civil Contempt Order - to cover up that she was 
really jailed for refusing silence of PJ, Benke, et.al. framing her for libel 
in the predicate case and Appellant’s refusal to sign a false confession under 
penalty of perjury. This falsification of the Sheriff Department record occurred
when the Court ordered the removal of the false criminal record under PC166 
and replacement of it with a false civil contempt record under CCP1218(a). The 
libelous falsification of Appellant’s Sheriff Department record is a criminal 
act in itself, to conceal unlawful and criminal acts involving PJ & Benke.

Read the "Motion To Disquality Justice Judith McConnell Self-Known To Be 
Maliciously Presiding Coram Non Judice" at our sister blog ContemptOfCourtFor.ME.

If YOU could stop corruption in the courts with just ONE email, would you do it?

Read how at our sister blog, Katy’s Exposure and then Just Answer the Damn Question!  Thanks for your help.

Are HUNDREDS of U.S. citizens willing to be filmed telling intricate, detailed lies – OR – are the United States courts wrought with corruption and cronyism? Watch the videos, Congress, and then Just Answer The Damn Question!

Corruption and Burn Out

On Sunday, December 2, 2012, Mr. William Windsor of Lawless America wrote, “700 Videos now posted exposing Government Corruption and Judicial Corruption by the Lawless America Revolution” He also wrote, “Now when you watch one of our YouTube videos, please click the LIKE button, and please click SHARE to post it on your Facebook page.  It is up to each and every one of us to spread the word about the need to save America.

To watch the 700 videos, which are stated to only be half of those already filmed to be shared with Congress and to read more of this peaceful revolution to restore integrity in US gov’t and US courts, please go to the website of LAWLESS AMERICATo see videos about a specific topic or from a specific state, use the Playlists

Please forward this blog to others who would like to help Mr. Windsor and the self professed “Nobodies” restore integrity in U.S. state and federal courts and government.

Thank you for your help,

Sharon Noonan Kramer 

PS. To read the Honorable Katherine Feinstein’s comments regarding the lack of credibility and integrity in the California judicial system, go to “One Legal Online Court Service”  Judge Feinstein is the Presiding Judge of the San Francisco Superior Court.  She is also  a past member of the California Commission on Judicial Performance and the daughter of U.S. Senator from California, Dianne Feinstein. Senator Feinstein is married to University of California Regent, Richard Blum.

“Does the foundational document of this case, the judgment as submitted from a prior case, show Sharon Kramer prevailed over GlobalTox, Inc., in trial and was awarded costs by judgment — or — is this Court acting with no subject matter jurisdiction under C.C.P. 664 (and thus no judicial immunity) to harass and conceal collusive criminal misconduct by plaintiffs, fellow officers of the courts and court clerks? Just Answer The Damn Question!”

As submitted For Dec 7th Motion HearingSharon Noonan Kramer

2031 Arborwood Place

Escondido, CA92029

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, NORTH DISTRICT

Bruce J. Kelman (and five owners of Veritox, Inc., Bryan Hardin, Coreen Robbins, Loni Swenson, Robert Schreibe & Robert Clark)                                              

v.

 

Sharon Kramer, Whistleblower of scientific fraud by Veritox, Inc. and fraud on the court by officers of the court 

Case No. 37-2010-00061530-CU-DF-NC Appellate Case No. D062764

DECLARATION UNDER DURESS OF SHARON KRAMER & PROPOSED CASE DISMISSAL IN SUPPORT OF “MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION TO VACATE VOID CORAM NON JUDICE ‘JUDGMENT AND ORDER FOR CIVIL CONTEMPT AND PERMANENT INJUCTION’ IN CRIMINAL VIOLATION OF C.C.P.1209(b).”

Hon. Robert Dahlquist Presiding

Department 29

Motion Hearing Date December 7, 2012

1:30 PM

    DECLARATION UNDER DURESS OF SHARON KRAMER

                1. In lawful accordance with Constitutional rights to freely speak truth in America and  Code of Civil Procedure 1209(b)[1] this filing may be read online at the blog, “Just Answer the Damn Question!” (short link http://wp.me/p10kHj-28  )  It is under the blog title of “Does the foundational document of this case, the judgment as submitted from a prior case, show Sharon Kramer prevailed over GlobalTox, Inc., in trial and was awarded costs by judgment — or — is this Court acting with no subject matter jurisdiction under C.C.P. 664[2] (and thus no judicial immunity) to harass and conceal collusive criminal misconduct by plaintiffs, fellow officers of the courts and court clerks?  Just Answer The Damn Question!

              2.  As of November 15, 2012 this case is now an appellate Unruh Civil Rights[3] case for the plaintiffs’, officers of the courts’ and clerks’ criminal roles in aiding the continuance of financially motivated discrimination against the environmentally disabled, their ability to live/work in contaminated buildings and the officer of the courts, et.al., direct hate crimes[4] against the disableds’ advocate, Sharon “Kramer”.  As such, it appears that all case filings must also now be served on the Solicitor General of the California Attorney General’s office. (Attached hereto as EXHIBIT 1, is Kramer’s Civil Case Information Statement “Attachment” Appellate Case No. D062764 Superior Court Case No. 37-2010-00061530-CU-DF-NC)

            3. The Attachment states on page 5, E. SERVICE REQUIREMENTS

Required to be served on the State Solicitor General at the Office of the 
Attorney General under Unruh, Civil Code 51.1  This case is the continuance of 
over seven years worth of fraud on the court and a hate crime by officers of 
the court, their clerks and the plaintiffs against an advocate for the 
environmentally disabled, Sharon Kramer. It is to conceal they have unlawfully 
aided and abetted a scientific fraud to remain in U.S. public health and 
California workman’s compensation policy by framing Sharon Kramer for libel 
with actual malice for exposing the financially motivated scientific fraud in 
policy that is adverse to the environmentally disabled; exposing how it came to
 be policy; and exposing who was involved in mass marketing the scientific fraud
 for the purpose of misleading U.S. courts to deny liability for causation of 
environmental illnesses. 

            4. In October of 2012, Judge Thomas P. Nugent was removed from his courtroom, Department 30; with no explanation given and no punishment rendered for incarcerating a United States citizen w/o subject matter jurisdiction, for refusing to commit perjury by signing a false confession to defraud the public (among other unlawful acts), and the case was reassigned to this Court.

           5. The direct evidence in the case file, now in this Court’s possession, shows the case was overseen by the prior court for nearly two years with no subject matter jurisdiction. This is because the foundational documents to this case, the judgment from a prior case, Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer Case No. GIN044539 and its remittitur Appellate Case No. D054496 are known to the court to fraudulent and void to be used for any purpose. (Attached hereto as EXHIBIT 2 collectively are i.) the December 20, 2010 Remittitur stating “Respondents” were parties on appeal; ii.) the September 2009 Certificate of Interested Persons only disclosing one “Respondent”, Bruce Kelman; iii.) page one of the September 2010 Appellate Opinion stating Kramer was a prevailing party awarded costs by judgment; iv.) the judgment as submitted as the foundational document to this case in November 2010 stating only Kelman as the prevailing party and no costs awarded by judgment to Kramer; v.) Justice Patricia Benke’s January 2011 refusal to recall and rescind the fraudulent remittitur and vacate the void judgment; vi.) an except of Kramer’s Appellate Brief showing the Appellate Justices knew they were committing fraud on the court by falsely stating Kramer was awarded costs by judgment and that they were concealing the undisclosed parties on appeal; and vii.) the December 31, 2008 Abstract of Judgment which shows the courts recorded that interest accruing costs were awarded to Kelman on September 24, 2008 – contradictory to the judgment as submitted as the sole foundation of this case, which states they were first awarded by judgment on December 18, 2008.    

               6. The direct evidence in the case file, now in this Court’s possession, shows that Judge Nugent incarcerated Kramer in March of 2012, caused her bodily harm and emotional distress then falsified the Sheriff Dept record to conceal what he had done – with no subject matter jurisdiction and thus with no judicial immunity. [5] [6] 

              7.  This court is now ruling with no subject matter jurisdiction if sanctions imposed for Kramer blogging of the criminal misconduct of the prior court and being ordered to publish a false confession of libel on the interent for a sentence she never even wrote, by the prior court who also had no subject matter jurisdiction and held an unlawful trial; is a lawful court order.[7]  It would appear to not get much dirtier than this matter before this court.

              8. The direct evidence in the case file, now in this Court’s possession, shows this incarceration was for Kramer’s refusal to sign a false confession on March 9, 2012 of being guilty of libel with actual malice within the first public writing, Kramer’s in March 2005, of how it became a fraud in public health policies that it was scientifically proven by Bruce “Kelman” PhD and undisclosed party Bryan “Hardin” PhD, that the “notion toxic mold is an insidious secret killer” was only being claimed by the environmentally disabled because of “media reports, trial lawyers, and junk science unsupported by actual scientific study”[8]; and for exposing the purpose of the mass marketing of scientific fraud was to mislead U.S. courts to deny liability for causation of illness.

               9. The direct evidence in the case file, now in this Court’s possession, shows that officers of the Appellate Court framed Kramer for libel in their 2006 anti-SLAPP Appellate Opinion, concealed it in their 2010 Appellate Opinion; and then the prior superior court in this case attempted to gag Kramer’s ability to write of the collusive misconduct by officers of the courts – jailed her, physically harmed her and libeled her when she refused silence. (Attached hereto as EXHIBIT 3[9] is Kramer’s June 5, 2012 “NOTICE TO COURT.  I AM NOT APPEARING BEFORE YOU AGAIN.  YOU ARE A LIAR AND A CRIMINAL AND I FEAR FOR MY LIFE BECAUSE OF IT.”

               10. On November 7, 2012, Kramer appeared before this Court at a LACK OF COURT JURISDICTION “HEARING” that had been scheduled to be heard before Judge Nugent.

               11. This Court attempted to not hold the HEARING, claiming the HEARING was not a proper court proceeding.  This Court is now indisputably aware of its lack of subject matter jurisdiction, yet has not dismissed the case of its own accord and appears to be attempting to continue to make rulings in the case with no subject matter jurisdiction knowing the foundational document to the case, the judgment from the prior case, is fraudulent and void to be used for any purpose including giving this court subject matter jurisdiction.[10]

               12. This Court is aware of the law that once jurisdiction has been challenged, it cannot be assumed.  It must be proven to exist.  It is the Court’s responsibility to prove it has jurisdiction – not the victim of the seven and a half years of collusive misconduct by officers of the court, plaintiffs and clerks to prove this Court does not have jurisdiction.

TO PROVE THIS COURT HAS SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION TO HEAR THIS DECEMBER 7, 2012 MOTION MADE UNDER DURESS, THIS COURT MUST PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTATION – WHICH IT CANNOT DO – OR DISMISS THE CASE:

             1.  A Certificate of Interested Persons submitted to the Appellate Court in Case No. D054496, which discloses there were multiple “Respondents” as parties on appeal and as is stated in the December 20, 2010 Appellate Court Remittitur.

           2. A judgment document from Case No. GIN044539 that was submitted as the sole foundation to this case in November 2010 which states Sharon Kramer was a prevailing party in trial who was awarded costs by judgment in lawful accordance with Code of Civil Procedure 664.

          3. A Notice of Entry of Judgment dated September 24, 2008, from the trial court to prevailing Pro Per Kramer in lawful accordance with Code of Civil Procedure 664.5(b).

          4. Documentation explaining how costs were awarded to Kelman with interest accruing beginning September 24, 2008, on the court recorded Abstract of Judgment of December 31, 2008 and Recorded Lien of January 19, 2009; and inconsistent with the sole foundational document to this case which states costs were first awarded by judgment on December 18, 2008. (All documents are fraudulent because the void judgment was antedated twice. Once when the costs were filled in w/o dating or initialing sometime in mid October 2008 making it appear costs were awarded on September 24, 2008 (three weeks before Kelman’s costs were submitted by officer of the court, Keith Scheuer, and include client commingled costs of trial loser, GlobalTox); and again when “mgarland 12/18/08” was added to the document after the abstract was recorded on December 31, 2008 by clerk of the court Michael Garland.)

               “The law provides that once State and Federal jurisdiction has been challenged, it musts be proven.” Main v Thiboutot, 100 S. Ct. 2502(1980) “Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time,” and “Jurisdiction, once challenged, cannot be assumed and must be decided.” Basso V: Utah Power & Light Co. 395 F 2d 906, 910  “Thus, where a judicial tribunal has no jurisdiction of the subject matter on which it assumes to act, its proceedings are absolutely void in the fullest sense of the term.” Dillon v. Dillon 187 p27   No sanction can be imposed absent proof of jurisdiction [Stanard v. Olesen, 74 S. Ct. 768] Once challenged, jurisdiction cannot be ‘assumed’, it must be proved to exist. [Stuck v. Medical Examiners, 94 Ca2d 751.211 P2s 389]  “Acts in excess of judicial authority constitutes misconduct, particularly where a judge deliberately disregards the requirements of fairness and due process.Gonzalez v. Commission on Judicial Performance, (1983) 33 Cal.3d 359, 371,374

               I declare under the laws of the State of California under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and executed by me this 29th day of November, 2012.

____________________________

Sharon Kramer, victim of over seven years of collusive misconduct of the California legal system for daring to speak the truth in America against the financial interests of U.S. Chamber of Commerce affiliates on behalf of the health, safety and welfare of the America public.


[1] C.C.P.1209(b) states, “A speech or publication reflecting upon or concerning a court or an officer thereof shall not be treated or punished as a contempt of the court unless made in the immediate presence of the court while in session and in such a manner as to actually interfere with its proceedings.”

[2] C.C.P. 664 states, “When trial by jury has been had, judgment must be entered 
by the clerk, in conformity to the verdict… In no case is a judgment effectual 
for any purpose until entered.
[3] Unruh, 51. (a) “This section shall be known, and may be cited, as the Unruh 
Civil Rights Act.(b) All persons within the jurisdiction of this state are free 
and equal, and no matter what their sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, 
national origin, disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital 
status, or sexual orientation are entitled to the full and equal accommodations,
 advantages, facilities,privileges, or services in all business establishments 
of every kind whatsoever.” (6)...includes a perception…that the person is 
associated with a person who has, or is perceived to have, any particular 
characteristic or characteristics within the listed categories. 51.1. “If a 
violation of Section 51, 51.5, 51.7, 51.9, or 52.1 is alleged or the application
 or construction of any of these sections is in issue in any proceeding in the 
Supreme Court of California, a state court of appeal, or the appellate division 
of a superior court, each party shall serve a copy of the party's brief or 
petition and brief, on the State Solicitor General at the Office of the Attorney
 General. No brief may be accepted for filing unless the proof of service shows 
service on the State Solicitor General.”
[4] Penal Code 422.55(a) “Hate crime” means a criminal act committed, in whole 
or in part, because of one or more of the following actual or perceived 
characteristics of the victim:(1) Disability.(7) Association with a person or 
group with one or more of these actual or perceived characteristics.(b) "Hate 
crime" includes, but is not limited to, a violation of Section 422.6. which 
states(a) No person, whether or not acting under color of law, shall by force or
 threat of force, willfully injure, intimidate, interfere with, oppress, or 
threaten any other person in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or 
privilege secured to him or her by the Constitution or laws of this state or by 
the Constitution or laws of the United States in whole or in part because of one
 or more of the actual or perceived characteristics of the victim listed in 
subdivision (a) of Section 422.55

[5] March 14, 2012 Court Transcript, Court sent Kramer to jail for refusing to commit perjury to defraud public with no jurisdiction. http://freepdfhosting.com/dbe7597bdb.pdf

[6] Evidence that Judge Nugent falsified Sheriff Dept record on April 5, 2012 to conceal Kramer was incarcerated for refusing to sign a false confession. http://freepdfhosting.com/011a20cc26.pdf

[7] December 7, 2012 Kramer’s Motion For Reconsideration submitted under duress. http://freepdfhosting.com/0bafcf85ca.pdf

[8] U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s 2003 A Scientific View of the Health Effects of Mold by Bruce Kelman & Bryan Hardin, co-owners of Veritox, Inc., states, “Thus the notion that toxic mold is an insidious secret killer as so many trial lawyers and media reports would claim is Junk Science unsupported by actual scientific study.” (Kelman & Hardin were paid by the Manhattan Institute think-tank to write the Chamber’s position statement. The writing cites false authorship of also being co-authored by Dr. Andrew Saxon of UCLA, according to Saxon’s statements made under oath and the only billable hours being Kelman and Hardin. Kelman has stated under oath it was specifically written to be shared with judges. It was the subject scientific fraud of Kramer’s March 2005 writing for which the courts framed her for libel for the words, “altered his under oath statements” in the 2006 appellate anti-SLAPP opinion. They also suppressed the evidence Kelman committed perjury to establish false light reason malice. They suppressed the evidence Hardin was an undisclosed party to the litigation on the appellate court filed Certificate of Interested Persons. They suppressed the evidence that the duo’s scientific fraud had been found to be a “huge leap” not able to be used to deny causation of illness, by a superior court in Sacramento, CA.  Officers of the courts have rolled down hill from there in collusive misconduct to continue to aid the fraud to be used in U.S. courts against the sick, injured and dying; and to conceal their criminal roles in aiding it by harassment of Kramer.)

[9] June 5, 2012 Notice to compromised court w/no subject matter jurisdiction of courts’ criminal acts, bodily harm, emotional distress & harassment of US citizen http://freepdfhosting.com/fd2a0d1cef.pdf

[10] November 2, 2012 Transcript of this Court being made aware it lacks subject matter jurisdiction because of fraud on the court by officers of the court, plaintiffs and clerks. http://freepdfhosting.com/16f8cb3941.pdf

November 29, 2012 faxes went sent to the EPA, FEMA, several U.S. Congressment and Senators, and President Obama showing how fraud on the court by officers of the court in this case is aiding to defraud the taxpayers over the mold issue while the victims of Hurricane Sandy are also the victims of corruption in the CA courts and politics over the mold issue in Washington DC.  “Congress, Please remove scientific fraud from policy that moldy buildings do not harm ~ and while you are at it remove corrupt officers of the California courts who aid this fraud to continue nationwide.”

Please watch the October 2012 ONE HOUR INTERVIEW http://wp.me/plYPz-3tc of Sharon Kramer by Mr. Walter Davis of Citizens Demanding Justice on behalf of the documentary, Lawless America The Movie. 

Please visit our sister blog, http://ContemptOfCourtFor.ME to see greater detail of the corrupt CA courts’ harassment of a whistle blower of scientific fraud in US public health policy, written and mass marketing to the courts on behalf of the financial interests of the affiliates of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

Did officers of the Appellate Court commit fraud on the court in a September 2010 appellate opinion by falsely stating a judgment that was never entered – or – does the Appellate Court not have jurisdiction now to hear an appeal under C.C.P. 664 because the sole foundational document to this case, the judgment from the prior case, is known to the officers of this court to be a void judgment? Just answer the damn question!

November 15, 2012

Civil Case Information Statement Attachment

Appellate Case No. D062764

Superior Court Case No. 37-2010-00061530-CU-DF-NC

Bruce J. Kelman (et. al.) v. Sharon Kramer

Document read in pdf

In lawful accordance with Code of Civil Procedure 1209(b) which states, “A speech or publication reflecting upon or concerning a court or an officer thereof shall not be treated or punished as a contempt of the court unless made in the immediate presence of the court while in session and in such a manner as to actually interfere with its proceedings.” and in accordance with the First Amendment of Constitution of the United States, this court filing may be read online at the blog “Just Answer the Damn Question!”.

It is under the title of “Did officers of the Appellate Court commit fraud on the court in a September 2010 appellate opinion by falsely stating a judgment that was never entered – or –  does the Appellate Court not have jurisdiction now to hear an appeal under C.C.P. 664 because the sole foundational document to this case, the judgment from the prior case, is known to the officers of this court to be a void judgment? Just answer the damn question!”  http://wp.me/p10kHj-1N

This is a limited civil case under $25,000.00.

Part I.

A. APPEALABILITY

On July 2, 2012, a judgment was entered by default for $1.00 after the court held a trial with no subject matter jurisdiction, and no notification it was proceeding with the trial.

On January 19, 2012, $19,000.00+ was awarded to the plaintiff(s) with no stated reason in writing or orally; and a lien was placed on Sharon Kramer’s property.

On July 2, 2012, $7,200+ was awarded to plaintiffs in attorney fees, because Sharon Kramer refused to appear before a court, with no subject matter jurisdiction, that had incarcerated her in March of 2012, had her unlawfully strip searched, caused her bodily harm and emotional distress for refusing to commit criminal perjury and sign a known false confession of being guilty of libel over a writing impacting public health, which also contained the false sentence, “I do not believe Dr. Kelman committed perjury” – when he did to establish false theme for malice and officers of this court concealed it in two appellate opinions.

On July 2, 2012, $3,000 in sanctions were issued with more threat of incarceration because Sharon Kramer refused to publish a false confession on the internet of being guilty of libel with actual malice for a sentence she never even wrote – which would aid to conceal this Appellate Court framed her for libel for a completely different sentences in two appellate opinions; one in the November 2006 anti-SLAPP opinion and again in September 2010 as they suppressed the evidence Bruce Kelman committed perjury to establish false theme for malice.

D. APPELLATE CASE HISTORY

I have a degree in marketing from Ole Miss and am an advocate for integrity in health marketing when setting public health policies. In 2005, I wrote of how a scientific fraudulent concept was mass marketed into US public health policy that it was scientifically proven moldy buildings do not harm. This was for the purpose to mislead courts to deny liability of moldy building stakeholders for causation of illness.

 The fraudsters sued me for libel for five words in the writing “altered his under oath statements”. The Case No. is GIN044539.  The compromised officers of the CA courts aided the fraudsters to falsely deem me guilty of libel.

In two appellate opinions they made the writing appear to have made a false accusation that it did not make, thereby aiding to cast doubt on all my words and aiding the fraud to continue to flourish and grow.  The anti-SLAPP Case No. is D047758.  On appeal after trial the Case No. is D054496.

In both appellate opinions, officers of the court also suppressed the evidence that the fraudsters committed perjury to establish libel law required reason for malice and that a retired U.S. Assistant Surgeon General, Bryan Hardin, is an undisclosed party to the litigation on the Certificate of Interested Persons. He was also a paid for hire co-author the scientific fraud for the US Chamber of Commerce and a compromised US policy setting medical association, the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM), the subjects of my writing of how the scientific fraud became policy. 

In January of 2011, Appellate Justice Patricia Benke refused to recall and rescind the fraudulent remittitur which awarded costs to “respondents” when there was only one “respondent” disclosed on the September 2009 Certificate of Interested Persons, Bruce Kelman.  She refused to set aside the known void judgment on record that was inconsistent with the stated judgment on record in the fraudulent September 2010 Appellate Opinion and inconsistent with the Abstract of Judgment and Lien recorded on Sharon Kramer’s property by the San Diego Superior Court.

Attached hereto collectively as EXHIBIT 1 are: i.) the first page of the September 2010 Appellate Opinion falsely stating a judgment had been entered in Sharon Kramer’s favor, ii.) the judgment document as submitted by Kelman as the foundation for this second case in November 2010, with no mention of Sharon Kramer being awarded a judgment or being a trial prevailing party iii) the December 20, 2010 Remittitur stating “respondents” were disclosed on appeal, iv.) the September 13, 2009 Certificate of Interested Persons only disclosing Kelman as a party on appeal, v.) July 2005, except of declaration of Sharon Kramer showing Bryan Hardin was a known party to the litigation all along, yet not disclosed on Certificates of Interested Persons vi.) December 30, 2008 Abstract of Judgment that differs from both the void judgment document that is the sole foundation of this case, and the stated judgment in the fraudulent September 2010 Appellate Opinion; and vii.) Office of the Court, Justice Benke’s, January 2011, refusals to recall and rescind the fraudulent remittitur and vacate the void judgment.)
 
In a second case, this case, in which the falsified and void judgment from the first case is the sole foundational document, they have tried to gag me of what they have done and the continued adverse impact on the public because of it.  In March 2012 they put me in jail for refusing to sign a false confession of being guilty of libel w/actual malice, had me unlawfully strip searched, caused me bodily harm and emotional distress, gave me a false criminal record for alleged civil contempt, and then libeled me by falsifying the Sheriff Dept record to conceal what they had done.  
 

My signature on the false confession would have absolved the collusive misconduct of the fraudsters, officers of the courts and their clerks that have aided $B in the defrauding of the public in a cost shifting scheme off of insurers and onto taxpayers for the burden of cost of environmental illness, death and disability.

Since the foundational document to the second case is void, the San Diego Superior officers of the court have been harassing me, jailing me, harming me physically, sanctioning me and trying to intimidate me into silence with no subject matter jurisdiction.  No jurisdiction = no judicial immunity for criminal misconduct of putting me in jail, falsifying court documents, etc. The numerous document falsifications by officers of the court and their clerks are in violation of Government Code 6203(a) which states, “Every officer authorized by law to make or give any certificate or other writing is guilty of a misdemeanor if he or she makes and delivers as true any certificate or writing containing statements which he or she knows to be false”, This is far more than a misdemeanor. It is billions in financially motivated hate crimes against the environmentally disabled with the compromised officers of the courts and their document falsifying clerks now desperate to conceal their unlawful roles in aiding it.

Needless to say, I have no intention of being silenced of the science fraud in policy and what the compromised leaders of the Ca judicial branch have done and continue to do to aid it; and to conceal their role in aiding it, while lives continue to be devastated daily.  This has been going on for seven and a half years and has taken my husband and me to the brink of poverty. 

I’m not shutting up until Justices Judith McConnell and Justice Richard Huffman of the Fourth District Division One Appellate Court in San Diego, CA, et. al., are removed from the bench and put behind bars for their collusive crimes against humanity, defrauding of the taxpayer of billions of dollars and treason against the United States Constitution they are sworn under oath to uphold.  Their clerk, Stephen Kelly, threatened me that McConnell would deem me a vexatious litigant if I filed anything in the appellate court regarding his falsification the December 2010 Remittitur under seal of the State of California.

McConnell is the former Chairwoman of the CA Comm on Judicial Performance (CJP). Huffman, the former Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Judicial Council (JC) for 14 years. This is the most powerful position in the CA judicial branch. I have him for fraud on the court in an appellate opinion to conceal that the judgement is void and fraudulent; and that they have tried to use the void judgment as a valid legal document to shut me up of officers of the CA courts colluding to defraud the public on behalf of the affiliates of the US Chamber of Commerce. 

So far, I can show direct evidence of twelve San Diego judiciaries being hands on involved, several clerks falsifying documents with the State Bar, CJP, JC, CA Chief Justice and local DA shielding them and aiding and abetting in the continuing harassment to try to silence and discredit me. Judge Thomas Nugent just lost his courtroom of 20 years in the North San Diego County Superior Court and they have brought a new man up to bat, Judge Robert Dahlquist, who can’t seem to grasp he has no legal jurisdiction to tell me to do anything while he is now also colluding to defraud.  Again, no valid legal document for foundation of case = no jurisdiction = no judicial immunity for conspiring to defraud the public in financially motivated hate crimes of the environmentally ill, disabled and dying – and their advocate, me.  I am also being cyberstalked by the “The Courthouse Gang” with the local district attorney refusing to take action to protect me, even though she knows I am fearful for my life from the massive fraud I have exposed in public health policy and in the California courts.

The above is just the CA courts’ and the local DA’s involvement. I can show direct evidence of much more involvement in WashingtonDC, in several federal and state agencies, and down both sides of the isle in both Congress and in the Senate aiding and benefiting from the scientific fraud remaining in policy directly because of the unlawful actions of the CA courts trying to silence and discredit me. It has been extremely difficult to get this matter to public light because of all the misinformation being spread over this matter and officers of the courts repeatedly libeling me to make me appear to be a malicious liar.

The matter is actually quite simple: I exposed fraud that was written into policy on behalf of the financial interests of affiliates of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and adverse to public health. Officers of the courts framed me for libel to make me look like a liar to aid the fraud to continue be able to sell doubt of causation of environmental illnesses in courts all across the US. Now they want me silenced by hook or by crook so they can stay on the bench and continue to aid this fraud that is nothing more than a financially motivated hate crime of me and the environmentally disabled and to aid many more frauds that are occurring in the courts of California by incestuously compromised officers of the courts.

E. SERVICE REQUIREMENTS

Required to be served on the State Solicitor General at the Office of the Attorney
General under Unruh: 51.1.  

This case is the continuance of over seven years worth of fraud on the court and a
hate crime by officers of the court, their clerks and the plaintiffs against an 
advocate for the environmentally disabled, Sharon Kramer. It is to conceal they 
have unlawfully aided and abetted a scientific fraud to remain in U.S. public 
health and California workman’s compensation policy by framing Sharon Kramer for 
libel with actual malice for exposing the financially motivated scientific fraud 
in policy that is adverse to the environmentally disabled; exposing how it came 
to be policy; and exposing who was involved in mass marketing the scientific fraud
for the purpose of misleading U.S. courts to deny liability for causation of 
environmental illnesses.  

"Disability" means any mental or physical disability as defined in Sections 12926 
of the Government Code.  The relevant section of this code state, k)"On the bases 
enumerated in this part" means or refers to discrimination on the basis of one or 
more of the following:…physical disability, mental disability, medical condition…
(l) "Physical disability" includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1) Having any physiological disease, disorder, condition…that does both of the 
following:(A) Affects one or more of the following body systems: neurological, 
immunological, musculoskeletal, special sense organs, respiratory, including 
speech organs, cardiovascular, reproductive,digestive, genitourinary, hemic and 
lymphatic, skin, and endocrine.(B) Limits a major life activity. For purposes of 
this section:(i) "Limits" shall be determined without regard to mitigating 
measures such as medications, assistive devices, prosthetics, or reasonable 
accommodations, unless the mitigating measure itself limits a major life activity.
(ii) A physiological disease, disorder, condition..limits a major life activity 
if it makes the achievement of the major life activity difficult.(iii) "Major life
 activities" shall be broadly construed and includes physical, mental, and social 
activities and working.(2) Any other health impairment not described in paragraph 
(1) that requires special education or related services. (6)(n) "…physical 
disability, mental disability, medical condition,.." includes a perception that 
the person has any of those characteristics or that the person is associated with 
a person who has, or is perceived to have, any of those characteristics.
Under Penal Code 422.55(a) “Hate crime” means a criminal act committed, in whole 
or in part, because of one or more of the following actual or perceived 
characteristics of the victim:(1) Disability.(7) Association with a person or 
group with one or more of these actual or perceived characteristics.(b) "Hate 
crime" includes, but is not limited to, a violation of Section 422.6. which states
(a) No person, whether or not acting under color of law, shall by force or threat 
of force, willfully injure, intimidate, interfere with, oppress, or threaten any 
other person in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured 
to him or her by the Constitution or laws of this state or by the Constitution or 
laws of the United States in whole or in part because of one or more of the actual
 or perceived characteristics of the victim listed in subdivision (a) of Section 
422.55.(b) No person, whether or not acting under color of law, shall knowingly 
deface, damage, or destroy the real or personal property of any other person for 
the purpose of intimidating or interfering with the free exercise or enjoyment of 
any right or privilege secured to the other person by the Constitution or laws of 
this state or by the Constitution or laws of the United States, in whole or in 
part because of one or more of the actual or perceived characteristics of the 
victim listed in subdivision (a) of Section 422.55.
Unruh states, “If a violation of Section 51, 51.5, 51.7, 51.9, or 52.1 is alleged 
or the application or construction of any of these sections is in issue in any 
proceeding in the Supreme Court of California, a state court of appeal, or the 
appellate division of a superior court, each party shall serve a copy of the party
's brief or petition and brief, on the State Solicitor General at the Office of 
the Attorney General. No brief may be accepted for filing unless the proof of 
service shows service on the State Solicitor General. Any party failing to comply 
with this requirement shall be given a reasonable opportunity to cure the failure 
before the court imposes any sanction and, in that instance, the court shall allow
the Attorney General reasonable additional time to file a brief in the matter.”

Part II. NATURE OF ACTION 
A. 12. Forced court filing under duress because of collusive misconduct by 
officers of the court and falsification of court documents. Fraud on the court by 
officers of the court, clerks and plaintiffs in financially motivated hate crimes 
against the environmentally disabled and their advocate, Sharon Kramer.  Need for 
court to recall and rescind the fraudulent anti-SLAPP opinion of November of 2006,
then step down off the bench.

Part III. PARTIES AND ATTORNEY INFORMATION

Bruce J. Kelman, President of Veritox, Inc.,

Attorney of Record, Keith Scheuer, Esq.  State Bar # 82797

Undisclosed parties to the litigation. (Attached hereto as EXHIBIT 2,  is the evidence that the Appellate Court is aware the void judgment from the prior case, which is the foundation of this case, awarded costs to the following five people and owners of Veritox, who Kramer prevailed over in the August 2008 trial)

  1. Bryan Hardin, Retired Assistant U.S. Surgeon General; Deputy Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Protection National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health; owner of Veritox, Inc.,
  2. Coreen Robbins, owner of Veritox, Inc.
  3. Loni Swenson, owner of Veritox, Inc.
  4. Robert Schreibe, owner of Veritox, Inc.
  5. Robert Clark, owner of Veritox, Inc.

Officers of the Court and Clerks who falsified court documents; suppressed evidence of plaintiff perjury, plaintiff counsel suborning of perjury, concealed parties to the litigation, and framed a United States citizen for libel with actual malice; then attempted to use a known void judgment document to conceal the collusive misconduct in a second case, this case, in financially motivated hate crimes of the environmentally disabled and their advocate, Sharon Kramer.

Keith Scheuer, Esq.

Tracey Sang, Esq.

Judge Michael Orfield (retired)

Justice Judith McConnell

Justice Cynthia Aaron

Justice Alex MacDonald

Judge Lisa Schall and her clerk, Michael Garland

Judge Joel Pressman

Judge William Dato and his clerk

Justice Patricia Benke

Justice Joanne Irrion

Clerk of the Appellate Court, Stephen Kelly

Judge Thomas Nugent and his clerks, Cheryl Karini and Alan Lum

Judge Earl Mass III

Judge Robert Dahlquist

Judge Robert Trentacosta,

Judge Kevin Enright

Chief Justice Ronald George

Chief Justice Tawny Cantil-Sayauke

Judicial Council Chairman Douglas Miller

Judicial Council Member Noreen Evans

Judicial Council Member Michael Feuer

Clerk of the San Diego Superior Court, Michael Roddy

District Attorney, Bonnie Dumanis, who receives millions annually in funding to stop insurer fraud and hate crimes in San Diego county, and instead has chosen to gain unfair advantage in county litigations by shielding mass corruption in the San Diego courts including but not limited to the Fourth District Division One Court of Appeals. 

November 15, 2012                                     _______________________________

                                                                              Sharon Kramer, United States citizen            

                                                                              and Appellant Under Duress

Read more at our sister blogs:

 ContemptOfCourtFor.Me  “Because the Constitution, thousands of lives and restoring scruples to the California judicial branch is worth the fight”

Katy’s Exposure  “Exposing environmental health threats and those responsible”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~